ReviewAnnals of joint2023
Stiffness and arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a literature review.
Review in Annals of joint, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence and risk factors of shoulder stiffness after rotator cuff repair: a meta-analysis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Pooled it
- Recovery Trajectory of Range of Motion and Its Association With Patient Factors During Early Postoperative Stiffness After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2026Article
- Comparative analysis of modified double-row suture bridge technique versus traditional single-row repair for massive rotator cuff tears with preserved muscle quality (Goutallier stage < 2): a retrospective cohort study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
- Clinical outcomes of modified Kessler tension-reducing suturing combined with double-row repair for Patte II-III rotator cuff tears.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Preoperative testosterone replacement therapy: a potential risk-factor for complications and reoperation after rotator cuff repair.JSES international · 2026Article
- Latent class analysis-derived prediction model of shoulder function after arthroscopic repair for rotator cuff tear: a large retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with manipulation under anesthesia yields similar clinical outcomes to isolated rotator cuff repair and is associated with lower retear rates in medium-sized tears.Clinics in shoulder and elbow · 2025Article
- Incidence and risk factors for shoulder stiffness after open and arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: Tendon retear is the most common complication following rotator cuff repair surgery. Understanding the factors that are associated with greater risks of retear is important so surgeons can provide accurate prognostic information to patients. Advanced age and larger tear size have been shown to be associated with greater risk of retear at 6 months using multiple logistic regression analysis. Stiffness is the second most common complication, however recent evidence suggests that early postoperative stiffness may be associated with a more robust healing response. Thus, this paper aims to critically review the independent predictors of retear in rotator cuff repair patients. Methods: Literature review was conducted using electronic databases from their dates of inception. Key Content and Findings: There are multiple factors that affect rotator cuff repair integrity detailed in the literature. Tear size appeared to be the most important predictor of retear following rotator cuff repair. Postoperative stiffness at 6 and 12 weeks after surgery appears to be a factor associated with more intact repairs at 6 months. Shoulder stiffness tends to resolve within 6 months following the operation. This protective effect persists up to 5 years postoperatively. Conclusions: Shoulder stiffness may be an important protective factor against rotator cuff retear which requires further investigation from future studies. It is important to determine the relative importance of stiffness when compared to known important factors such as tear size with regards to its effect on rotator cuff repair integrity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.