ReviewAnnals of joint2023
Anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament and the common autograft specimens for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
Review in Annals of joint, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical outcomes of quadriceps, hamstring, and bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts for ACL reconstruction: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Knee surgery & related research · 2026Review
- Deciphering the "Art" in Modeling and Simulation of the Knee Joint: Model Benchmarking.Journal of biomechanical engineering · 2026Article
- Non-Contact, Mechanical Fatigue-Related ACL Injury Prevention Through Extracellular Matrix Crosslink Preservation: A Narrative Review.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2026Review
- Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tissue Engineering: Biological Principles, Engineered Substitutes, and Preclinical Outcomes.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- ACL injuries in skeletally immature athletes.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Review
- Outcomes of arthroscopic-assisted mini-open anatomic reconstruction using autologous tendon for ankle ligament injuries and its effect on functional recovery.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A thorough understanding of the anatomical properties of the native anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), as well as the native specimens that are most commonly considered as viable autograft choices for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), is warranted for continuing to pursue the best-possible graft choice for patients undergoing ACLR. While a wide variety of graft choices remain available to the operating surgeon, choosing the correct graft choice remains a consideration and discussion with patients on the pros and cons of each option. This article combines a review of the current literature on the quantitative and qualitative anatomy of the native ACL and common autograft specimens with the expert consensus of the senior author on the surgically-pertinent anatomy of these structures. The purpose of this article is to review the anatomy pertaining to the native ACL, along with the distal anatomy of the hamstring tendons, patellar tendon and quadriceps tendon (QT). Multiple tendinous and ligamentous structures exist around the knee that serve as viable candidates for use as autologous grafts for ACLR, and the anatomy of these distal extents of these structures are discussed thoroughly, including bony attachments, quantitative and relational anatomy, cross sectional area, and histological features of these structures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.