Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38529237›Full record

ReviewAnnals of joint2023

Biomechanical considerations for graft choice in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Mark T Banovetz, Nicholas I Kennedy, Robert F LaPrade, Lars Engebretsen, Gilbert Moatshe

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of joint, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Comparison of autograft and allograft outcomes in adolescent ACL reconstruction: a propensity score analysis.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. ACL Graft Selection Based on Age and Sport.Video journal of sports medicine
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mark T BanovetzUniversity of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Nicholas I KennedyTwin Cities Orthopedics, Edina, MN, USA.
Robert F LaPradeTwin Cities Orthopedics, Edina, MN, USA.
Lars EngebretsenDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Oslo Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Gilbert MoatsheDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Oslo Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Twin Cities Orthopedics · USUniversity of Minnesota Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Injury to the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) of the knee is common and often requires surgical reconstruction. There are numerous graft options available to the operating surgeon, to each of which a growing body of dedicated literature exists. Each of these potential choices of ACL graft specimen has a distinctive set of biomechanical properties, clinical outcome profiles, and other special considerations (e.g., autograft versus allograft, harvest site factors, and operating time). The purpose of this review is to discuss the biomechanical characteristics of the native ACL alongside those of several of the most commonly used ACL graft specimens based on a current review of the biomechanical literature. In doing so, this review will also briefly discuss the biomechanical implications for allograft versus autograft usage and single-bundle versus double-bundle repair techniques. This review lists and discusses the stress, strain, stiffness, Young's modulus, and ultimate load to failure of the native ACL, several common autografts [patellar bone-tendon-bone (BTB), hamstring tendon (HT), and quadriceps tendon (QT)], and several common allografts. Given the important biomechanical role of the ACL in stabilizing the knee to translational and rotational forces, it is crucial that the operating surgeon make a decision on graft choice that is informed in the biomechanical implications of ACL graft selection.

Indexed as

allograftAnterior cruciate ligament (ACL)autograftbiomechanicsreconstruction

Identifiers

PMID38529237
PMCPMC10929340
OpenAlexW4362730552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.