Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38529210›Full record

ArticleJB & JS open access

Retainment of U.S. Orthopaedic Surgeons in Academia from 2016 to 2022.

Matthew Weintraub, David Ahn, Isabel Herzog, Dhruv Mendiratta, Zheshi Zheng, Neil Kaushal, Michael Vosbikian, Alice Chu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JB & JS open access. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Academic Orthopaedic Surgeon Financial Compensation in the United States: Trends and Distribution.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Matthew WeintraubDepartment of Orthopedics, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1552-5953
David AhnDepartment of Orthopedics, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-4604-4102
Isabel HerzogDepartment of Orthopedics, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7491-5746
Dhruv MendirattaDepartment of Orthopedics, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2081-1102
Zheshi ZhengDepartment of Statistics, Rutgers University, Newark, New Jersey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6383-434X
Neil KaushalDepartment of Orthopedics, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3623-1591
Michael VosbikianDepartment of Orthopedics, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0522-1745
Alice ChuDepartment of Orthopedics, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6413-4938
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Academic medical centers greatly benefit from retaining their physicians; that ensures continuity in patient care, enhances resident education, and maintains a pool of experienced clinicians and researchers. Despite its importance, little research has been published on the retainment of academic faculty in orthopaedics. To address this gap, this study investigates the demographic trends of academic orthopaedic surgeons from 2016 to 2022. By analyzing data pertaining to gender distribution, years of practice, research productivity, and institutional rankings, we aimed to gain insights into the factors influencing faculty retainment, institution changes, and new entrants into academic orthopaedics. Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional analysis of U.S. academic orthopaedic surgeons affiliated with programs under the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) in 2016 and 2022 was performed. Faculty present in both the 2016 and the 2022 data were classified as being "retained" in academia; those present only in 2016, as having "left" academia; and those present only in 2022, as being "new" to academia. The retained group was then divided into movers (those who moved to other institutions) and non-movers. Results: Retained orthopaedists had fewer years of practice, a higher h-index (Hirsch index), and more publications. Non-fellowship-trained orthopaedists had less retainment in academia, and orthopaedists with fellowships in oncology had more retainment in academia. Additionally, movers also had fewer years in practice but an equal level of scholarly productivity when compared with non-movers. Lastly, higher-ranked academic programs retained a greater proportion of orthopaedic surgeons. Conclusions: Over the study period, a majority of orthopaedists (56.99%) chose to remain in academia. Those retained tended to be in the earlier stages of their careers, yet demonstrated higher research output. Notably, the representation of female orthopaedists in academic orthopaedics is on the rise. Conversely, lower-ranked programs faced higher turnover rates, highlighting the challenges that they encounter in retaining faculty members. Clinical Relevance: Academic medical centers benefit from retaining orthopaedic surgeons by maintaining patient relationships, having consistency in resident education, and building on clinical and research expertise. Likewise, orthopaedists benefit from understanding the trends in current academic employment, in order to optimize career planning decisions.

Identifiers

PMID38529210
PMCPMC10959563
OpenAlexW4393142192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.