Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38529083›Full record

ArticleInflammatory intestinal diseases

Laparoscopy-Assisted Restorative Proctocolectomy with Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis in Middle Colic Artery Ligation Immediately before Specimen Removal.

Keiji Matsuda, Yojiro Hashiguchi, Tamuro Hayama, Kurara Hayashi, Toshiya Miyata, Kentaro Asako, Yoshihisa Fukushima, Ryu Shimada, Kensuke Kaneko, Keijiro Nozawa and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Inflammatory intestinal diseases. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 91% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Keiji MatsudaDepartment of Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yojiro HashiguchiDepartment of Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Tamuro HayamaDepartment of Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Kurara HayashiDepartment of Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Toshiya MiyataDepartment of Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Kentaro AsakoDepartment of Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshihisa FukushimaDepartment of Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Ryu ShimadaDepartment of Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Kensuke KanekoDepartment of Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Keijiro NozawaDepartment of Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroki OchiaiDepartment of Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Takatsugu YamamotoDepartment of Medicine, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Teikyo University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the surgical procedure for ulcerative colitis (UC). Intestinal ischemia may occur if the main blood vessels are ligated at an early stage of this surgery. Considering that the blood flow in the large intestine can be maintained by preserving the middle colic artery, we have used a new IPAA method: ligating the middle colic artery immediately before removal of the specimens ("M-method"). Here, we evaluated the M-method's clinical outcomes. Methods: Between April 2009 and December 2021, 13 patients underwent a laparoscopy-assisted IPAA procedure at our institution. The conventional method was used for 6 patients, and the M-method was used for the other 7 patients. We retrospectively analyzed the cases' clinical notes. Results: The M-method's rate of postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo classification grade II or more) was significantly lower than that of the conventional method (14.2% vs. 83.3%). The M-method group's postoperative stay period was also significantly shorter (average 16.4 days vs. 55.5). There were significant differences in the albumin value and the ratio of the modified GPS score 1 or 2 on the 7th postoperative day between the M- and conventional methods (average 3.15 vs. 2.5, average 4/7 vs. 6/6). However, it is necessary to consider the small number of cases and the uncontrolled historical comparison. Conclusion: Late ligation of the middle colic artery may be beneficial for patients' post-surgery recovery and can be recommended for IPAAs in UC patients.

Indexed as

ComplicationIleal pouch-anal anastomosisLate ligation of middle colic arterySurgeryUlcerative colitis

Identifiers

PMID38529083
PMCPMC10963053
OpenAlexW4394740807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.