Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38529026›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2024

No recovery in the biomass of flying insects over the last decade in German nature protected areas.

Roland Mühlethaler, Sebastian Köthe, Thomas Hörren, Martin Sorg, Lisa Eichler, Gerlind U C Lehmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Roland MühlethalerNABU (The Nature and Biodiversity Conservation Union) Berlin Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3858-4171
Sebastian KötheNABU (The Nature and Biodiversity Conservation Union) Berlin Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0489-9909
Thomas HörrenEntomological Society Krefeld (EVK) Krefeld Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4062-3707
Martin SorgEntomological Society Krefeld (EVK) Krefeld Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6406-2778
Lisa EichlerLeibniz Institute of Ecological Urban and Regional Development (IOER) Dresden Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8642-0759
Gerlind U C LehmannNABU (The Nature and Biodiversity Conservation Union) Berlin Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0559-6002

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Five years after a German study on insect biomass described a multi-decade decline in nature protected habitats, the DINA (Diversity of Insects in Nature protected Areas) project has investigated the status of insects in 21 selected nature reserves across Germany in the years 2020 and 2021. We used the same methods and protocols for trapping and measuring the biomass of flying insects as in the earlier study. Across two vegetation periods, we accumulated a comprehensive data set of 1621 data points of two-week emptying intervals to evaluate the insect biomass along gradients from arable land into nature reserves through transects of Malaise traps. On average, we observed an increase in maximum insect biomass per day along the transect from the edge to the centre of the nature reserve. Overall, the measured insect biomass remained at low levels, consistent with previous findings from the years 2007-2016. There were no significant regional differences. The results show that protected habitats have higher insect biomass compared to farmland and are therefore essential for insects but are unlikely to be sufficient to sustain insect biodiversity. Further measures need to be taken for better protection and sustainment of insects, which fulfil key functions in all terrestrial ecosystems.

Indexed as

agriculturebiodiversity lossinsect biomassinsect declinemalaise trapsnatura 2000nature conservation

Identifiers

PMID38529026
PMCPMC10961242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.