Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38528991›Full record

ReviewReproductive medicine and biology

Efficacy and safety of follitropin delta versus follitropin alpha/beta in infertility treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Shinnosuke Komiya, Jun Watanabe, Takero Terayama, Kyosuke Kamijo, Hidetaka Okada

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Reproductive medicine and biology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Shinnosuke KomiyaHORAC Grand Front Osaka Clinic Osaka Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5587-7809
Jun WatanabeSystematic Review Workshop Peer Support Group (SRWS-PSG) Osaka Japan.
Takero TerayamaSystematic Review Workshop Peer Support Group (SRWS-PSG) Osaka Japan.
Kyosuke KamijoSystematic Review Workshop Peer Support Group (SRWS-PSG) Osaka Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7375-7651
Hidetaka OkadaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology Kansai Medical University Graduate School of Medicine Hirakata, Osaka Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7932-6999
Kansai Medical University · JPJichi Medical University · JPNagano Municipal Hospital · JPNational Defense Medical College · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Follitropin δ may be an alternative to conventional follitropin α/β for controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) within assisted reproductive treatment (ART), but its efficacy and safety remain unknown. We performed a random-effects meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of follitropin δ and follitropin α/β. Methods: We searched randomized controlled trials comparing follitropin δ and follitropin α/β using MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov, and WHO-ITCRP on December 14, 2022. The primary outcomes were the live birth rate and the incidence of moderate or severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). The certainty of the evidence was assessed using the grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation approach. The protocol was registered on the Open Science Framework. Results: Three studies involving 2682 participants were included in our meta-analysis. The results indicated that follitropin δ may result in little to no difference in live birth rates (risk ratio [RR], 1.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.91-1.38; low certainty) and the incidence of moderate or severe OHSS (RR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.48-1.26; low certainty) compared with follitropin α/β. Conclusion: Follitropin δ may result in little to no difference in COS compared with follitropin α/β, especially in terms of live births and safety.

Indexed as

assisted reproductive techniquesfemale infertilityfertilization in vitrofollicle‐stimulating hormoneovarian hyperstimulation syndrome

Identifiers

PMID38528991
PMCPMC10961712
OpenAlexW4393170113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.