Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38528848›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2024

The PUG Flap: Conjoined Profunda Artery Perforator and Upper Gracilis Flap for Breast Reconstruction.

Isra Abdulwadood, Lacey R Pflibsen, Nicholas R Jarvis, Sebastian Winocour, Alanna M Rebecca, William J Casey, Edward M Reece

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Isra AbdulwadoodFrom Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Phoenix, Ariz.
Lacey R PflibsenDepartment of Surgery, Mayo Clinic Health Systems, Eau Claire, Wis.
Nicholas R JarvisFrom Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Phoenix, Ariz.
Sebastian WinocourDivision of Adult Plastic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex.
Alanna M RebeccaDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Ariz.
William J CaseyDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Ariz.
Edward M ReeceDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Ariz.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abdominal-based free flaps are the mainstay of autologous breast reconstruction; however, the region may not be ideal for patients with inadequate soft tissue or history of abdominal surgery. This case describes the use of a novel conjoined flap based on the profunda artery perforator and upper gracilis pedicles, named the perforator and upper gracilis (PUG) flap. This flap design aims to maximize medial thigh flap volume while ensuring robust tissue perforation. Here, we present our experience with the PUG flap in a breast cancer patient undergoing autologous reconstruction. The patient was a 41-year-old woman seeking nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate autologous reconstruction with the PUG flap due to limited abdominal tissue availability. The gracilis and profunda artery perforator flaps were elevated using one boomerang-style skin paddle. Once harvested, the flaps were inset with antegrade and retrograde flow off the internal mammary arteries and both respective internal mammary veins. The donor site was closed in a V-Y pattern resulting in a thigh lift-type lift and concealed scar. In conclusion, the boomerang-style PUG flap maximizes medial thigh free tissue transfer volume, offers internal blood flow redundancy, and maintains good cosmesis of the donor site.

Identifiers

PMID38528848
PMCPMC10962896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.