Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38528792›Full record

ArticleCognitive science2024

Can Infants Retain Statistically Segmented Words and Mappings Across a Delay?

Ferhat Karaman, Jill Lany, Jessica F Hay

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ferhat KaramanDepartment of Psychology, Uşak University.
Jill LanyDepartment of Psychology, Lancaster University.
Jessica F HayDepartment of Psychology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville.
University of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Tennessee at Knoxville · US

Funding

Infant statistical learning: Resilience, longevity, and specificityR01HD083312 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE KNOXVILLE · PI HAY, JESSICA S · 2015 to 2019
$1.3M
The Role of Statistical Learning in Acquiring Syntactic CategoriesF32HD057698 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI LANY, JILL · 2008 to 2009
$97k
NICHD NIH HHS F32 HD057698NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD083312
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infants are sensitive to statistics in spoken language that aid word-form segmentation and immediate mapping to referents. However, it is not clear whether this sensitivity influences the formation and retention of word-referent mappings across a delay, two real-world challenges that learners must overcome. We tested how the timing of referent training, relative to familiarization with transitional probabilities (TPs) in speech, impacts English-learning 23-month-olds' ability to form and retain word-referent mappings. In Experiment 1, we tested infants' ability to retain TP information across a 10-min delay and use it in the service of word learning. Infants successfully mapped high-TP but not low-TP words to referents. In Experiment 2, infants readily mapped the same words even when they were unfamiliar. In Experiment 3, high- and low-TP word-referent mappings were trained immediately after familiarization, and infants readily remembered these associations 10 min later. In sum, although 23-month-old infants do not need strong statistics to map word forms to referents immediately, or to remember those mappings across a delay, infants are nevertheless sensitive to these statistics in the speech stream, and they influence mapping after a delay. These findings suggest that, by 23 months of age, sensitivity to statistics in speech may impact infants' language development by leading word forms with low coherence to be poorly mapped following even a short period of consolidation.

Indexed as

Language DevelopmentSpeech PerceptionChild, PreschoolHumansInfantLanguageLearningSpeechVerbal LearningInfant memoryLabel‐object mappingStatistical learningWord learningWord segmentation

Identifiers

PMID38528792
PMCPMC10977659
OpenAlexW4393195924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.