ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2024
Identification of potential cell death-related biomarkers for diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identification of telomere-related gene signatures for immune cell infiltration and prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- BHLHE41-SLC7A11 transcriptional axis and chromatin remodeling signatures in osteogenic-lineage disulfidptosis-like stress in osteoporosis.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Article
- Exploring the role of mitochondrial dysfunction-related genes in osteoporosis using weighted gene co-expression network analysis and machine learning.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Identification of circRNA-Based Biomarkers and ceRNA Mechanism in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.Cell biochemistry and biophysics · 2025Article
- Bioinformatics analysis of oxidative phosphorylation-related differentially expressed genes in osteoporosis.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Application of artificial intelligence in osteoporosis: a review.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to identify potential biomarkers for the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis (OP).
methodsData sets were downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus database, and differentially programmed cell death-related genes were screened. Functional analyses were performed to predict the biological processes associated with these genes. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), support vector machine (SVM), and random forest (RF) machine learning algorithms were used to screen for characteristic genes, and receiver operating characteristics were used to evaluate the diagnosis of disease characteristic gene values. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) and single-sample GSEA were conducted to analyze the correlation between characteristic genes and immune infiltrates. Cytoscape and the Drug Gene Interaction Database (DGIdb) were used to construct the mitochondrial RNA-mRNA-transcription factor network and explore small-molecule drugs. Reverse transcription real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) analysis was performed to evaluate the expression of biomarker genes in clinical samples.
resultsIn total, 25 differential cell death genes were identified. Among these, two genes were screened using the LASSO, SVM, and RF algorithms as characteristic genes, including BRSK2 and VPS35. In GSE56815, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of BRSK2 was 0.761 and that of VPS35 was 0.789. In addition, immune cell infiltration analysis showed that BRSK2 positively correlated with CD56dim natural killer cells and negatively correlated with central memory CD4 + T cells. Based on the data from DGIdb, hesperadin was associated with BRSK2, and melagatran was associated with VPS35. BRSK2 and VPS35 were expectably upregulated in OP group compared with controls (all p < 0.05).
conclusionsBRSK2 and VPS35 may be important diagnostic biomarkers of OP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.