Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38528186›Full record

ArticleNature methods2024

Assessing GPT-4 for cell type annotation in single-cell RNA-seq analysis.

Wenpin Hou, Zhicheng Ji

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature methods, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 155 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
155citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

155 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. APOEScience advances · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

95 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Wenpin HouDepartment of Biostatistics, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York City, NY, USA. wh2526@cumc.columbia.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0972-2192
Zhicheng JiDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA. zhicheng.ji@duke.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9457-4704

Funding

The Duke Senescent Cell Evaluations in Normal Tissues (SCENT) Mapping CenterU54AG075936 · NIA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI NIXON, ANDREW B. · 2021 to 2025
$12.7M
Methods for inferring and analyzing gene regulatory networks using single-cell multiomics and spatial genomics dataR35GM150887 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Wenpin Hou · 2023 to 2026
$1.6M
Computational Methods for Inferring Single-cell DNA Methylation and its Spatial LandscapeR00HG011468 · NHGRI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI HOU, WENPIN · 2022 to 2024
$747k
NHGRI NIH HHS R00 HG011468NIA NIH HHS U54 AG075936NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM150887
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Here we demonstrate that the large language model GPT-4 can accurately annotate cell types using marker gene information in single-cell RNA sequencing analysis. When evaluated across hundreds of tissue and cell types, GPT-4 generates cell type annotations exhibiting strong concordance with manual annotations. This capability can considerably reduce the effort and expertise required for cell type annotation. Additionally, we have developed an R software package GPTCelltype for GPT-4's automated cell type annotation.

Indexed as

Single-Cell Gene Expression AnalysisSoftwareAnimalsHumansMiceMolecular Sequence AnnotationRNA-Seq

Identifiers

PMID38528186
PMCPMC11310073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.