Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38528163›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurology2024

Real-World experience with efgartigimod in patients with myasthenia gravis.

Lior Fuchs, Shahar Shelly, Ifat Vigiser, Hadar Kolb, Keren Regev, Yoel Schwartzmann, Adi Vaknin-Dembinsky, Amir Dori, Arnon Karni

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Heterogeneous response to efgartigimod in real-world experience with myasthenia gravis: Predictors and treatment strategies.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2026
    Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. C5 complement inhibition versus FcRn modulation in generalised myasthenia gravis.Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry · 2025
    Observational
  19. Article
  20. New and Emerging Biological Therapies for Myasthenia Gravis: A Focussed Review for Clinical Decision-Making.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Lior FuchsFaculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel.
Shahar ShellyDepartment of Neurology, Rambam Medical Center, Haifa, Israel.
Ifat VigiserFaculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel.
Hadar KolbNeuroimmunology and MS Unit, Neurology Institute, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Keren RegevNeuroimmunology and MS Unit, Neurology Institute, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Yoel SchwartzmannDepartment of Neurology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Adi Vaknin-DembinskyDepartment of Neurology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Amir DoriFaculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel.
Arnon KarniFaculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel. arnonk@tlvmc.gov.il.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5625-7900
Tel Aviv University · ILTel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center · ILHadassah Medical Center · ILHebrew University of Jerusalem · ILTechnion – Israel Institute of Technology · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recommendations for the treatment of myasthenia gravis (MG) have been difficult to develop because of limited evidence from large randomized controlled trials. New drugs and treatment approaches have recently been shown to be effective in phase 3 studies in seropositive generalized (g) MG. One such drug is efgartigimod, a human-Fc-fragment of IgG1, with a high affinity for the endosomal FcRn. We conducted a multicenter study to evaluate the real-world clinical and safety effects of efgartigimod in 22 gMG patients. We evaluated the strategies for the timing of re-treatment with it. The participants received a total of 59 efgartigimod -treatment cycles. The median number of cycles was 2 (range 1-6). Twenty patients (86.3%) improved by at least 2 MG-ADL points after the first treatment cycle. The median MG-ADL score at baseline was 6.5 (range: 3-17) and 2.5 (range: 0-9) post-treatment (p < 0.001). A consistent improvement of at least 2 points in the MG-ADL score after each cycle occurs in 18 patients. The effect duration of the treatment was usually between 4 and 12 weeks. Two major clinical patterns of treatment response were found. Treatment with efgartigimod was also associated with significant reductions of prednisone doses Overall, the treatment was safe and associated with only minor adverse events. The single fatality was apparently due tosevere respiratory failure. We found that efgartigimod is clinically effective, may be used as a steroid sparing agent and is generally safe for gMG patients. We recommend a personalized preventive treatment approach until clinical stabilization, followed by discontinuation and periodic evaluations.

Indexed as

Myasthenia GravisAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeEfgartigimodGeneralized myasthenia gravisMG-ADLPrednisone

Identifiers

PMID38528163
OpenAlexW4393162611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.