Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38528155›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Molecular cell biology2024

Cellular and molecular mechanisms of skin wound healing.

Oscar A Peña, Paul Martin

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 663 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
663citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
288.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

663 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1,159 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Efficacy of energy-based devices on episiotomy pain and healing: A systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Therapeutic potential ofPharmaceutical biology · 2026
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Thromborepair: the tissue repair partner to thromboinflammation.Blood vessels, thrombosis & hemostasis · 2026
    Review
  15. Self-Adaptive Biomimetic Nanocomposite Hydrogel Orchestrates Dual-Targeting and On-Demand HAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

603 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Oscar A PeñaSchool of Biochemistry, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. oscar.pena@bristol.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2582-0238
Paul MartinSchool of Biochemistry, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. paul.martin@bristol.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2665-5086
At Bristol · GBUniversity of Bristol · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wound healing is a complex process that involves the coordinated actions of many different tissues and cell lineages. It requires tight orchestration of cell migration, proliferation, matrix deposition and remodelling, alongside inflammation and angiogenesis. Whereas small skin wounds heal in days, larger injuries resulting from trauma, acute illness or major surgery can take several weeks to heal, generally leaving behind a fibrotic scar that can impact tissue function. Development of therapeutics to prevent scarring and successfully repair chronic wounds requires a fuller knowledge of the cellular and molecular mechanisms driving wound healing. In this Review, we discuss the current understanding of the different phases of wound healing, from clot formation through re-epithelialization, angiogenesis and subsequent scar deposition. We highlight the contribution of different cell types to skin repair, with emphasis on how both innate and adaptive immune cells in the wound inflammatory response influence classically studied wound cell lineages, including keratinocytes, fibroblasts and endothelial cells, but also some of the less-studied cell lineages such as adipocytes, melanocytes and cutaneous nerves. Finally, we discuss newer approaches and research directions that have the potential to further our understanding of the mechanisms underpinning tissue repair.

Indexed as

SkinWound HealingAnimalsCicatrixHumansInflammationKeratinocytesNeovascularization, Physiologic

Identifiers

PMID38528155
OpenAlexW4393144087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.