Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38528088›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

The reproduction process of Gram-positive protocells.

Dheeraj Kanaparthi, Marko Lampe, Jan-Hagen Krohn, Baoli Zhu, Falk Hildebrand, Thomas Boesen, Andreas Klingl, Prasad Phapale, Tillmann Lueders

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Dheeraj KanaparthiDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Biophysics, Max-Planck Institute for Biochemistry, Munich, Germany. kanaparthi@biochem.mpg.de.
Marko LampeAdvanced Light Microscopy Facility, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany.
Jan-Hagen KrohnDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Biophysics, Max-Planck Institute for Biochemistry, Munich, Germany.
Baoli ZhuChair of Ecological Microbiology, BayCeer, University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany.
Falk HildebrandQuadrum Institute, Norwich, UK.
Thomas BoesenDepartment of Biosciences, Center for Electromicrobiology, Aarhus, Denmark.
Andreas KlinglDepartment of Biology, LMU, Planegg-Martinsried, Germany.
Prasad PhapaleEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany.
Tillmann LuedersChair of Ecological Microbiology, BayCeer, University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany. Tillmann.Lueders@uni-bayreuth.de.
European Molecular Biology Laboratory · DEUniversity of Bayreuth · DEExcellence Cluster Origins · DEQuadram Institute · GBUrologische Klinik München · DE

Funding

European Research Council 616644
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protocells are believed to have existed on early Earth prior to the emergence of prokaryotes. Due to their rudimentary nature, it is widely accepted that these protocells lacked intracellular mechanisms to regulate their reproduction, thereby relying heavily on environmental conditions. To understand protocell reproduction, we adopted a top-down approach of transforming a Gram-positive bacterium into a lipid-vesicle-like state. In this state, cells lacked intrinsic mechanisms to regulate their morphology or reproduction, resembling theoretical propositions on protocells. Subsequently, we grew these proxy-protocells under the environmental conditions of early Earth to understand their impact on protocell reproduction. Despite the lack of molecular biological coordination, cells in our study underwent reproduction in an organized manner. The method and the efficiency of their reproduction can be explained by an interplay between the physicochemical properties of cell constituents and environmental conditions. While the overall reproductive efficiency in these top-down modified cells was lower than their counterparts with a cell wall, the process always resulted in viable daughter cells. Given the simplicity and suitability of this reproduction method to early Earth environmental conditions, we propose that primitive protocells likely reproduced by a process like the one we described below.

Indexed as

Artificial CellsReproduction

Identifiers

PMID38528088
PMCPMC10963365
OpenAlexW4393139418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.