ArticleMolecular psychiatry2024
Resting state functional connectivity modifications in monoaminergic circuits underpin fatigue development in patients with multiple sclerosis.
Article in Molecular psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Functional connectivity dynamics of monoaminergic circuits related to fatigue in multiple sclerosis.Journal of neurology · 2026Article
- White matter volume and microstructural integrity are associated with fatigue in relapsing multiple sclerosis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Association between CD20European journal of neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dysregulation of monoaminergic networks might have a role in the pathogenesis of fatigue in multiple sclerosis (MS). We investigated longitudinal changes of resting state (RS) functional connectivity (FC) in monoaminergic networks and their association with the development of fatigue in MS. Eighty-nine MS patients and 49 age- and sex-matched healthy controls (HC) underwent neurological, fatigue, and RS functional MRI assessment at baseline and after a median follow-up of 1.3 years (interquartile range = 1.01-2.01 years). Monoaminergic-related RS FC was estimated with an independent component analysis constrained to PET atlases for dopamine (DA), noradrenaline (NA), and serotonin (5-HT) transporters. At baseline, 24 (27%) MS patients were fatigued (F) and 65 were not fatigued (NF). Of these, 22 (34%) developed fatigue (DEV-FAT) at follow-up and 43 remained not fatigued (NO-FAT). At baseline, F-MS patients showed increased monoaminergic-related RS FC in the caudate nucleus vs NF-MS and in the hippocampal, postcentral, temporal, and occipital cortices vs NF-MS and HC. Moreover, F-MS patients exhibited decreased RS FC in the frontal cortex vs NF-MS and HC, and in the thalamus vs NF-MS. During the follow-up, no RS FC changes were observed in HC. NO-FAT patients showed limited DA-related RS FC modifications, whereas DEV-FAT MS patients showed increased DA-related RS FC in the left hippocampus, significant at time-by-group interaction analysis. In the NA-related network, NO-FAT patients showed decreased RS FC over time in the left superior frontal gyrus. This region showed increased RS FC in both DEV-FAT and F-MS patients; this divergent behavior was significant at time-by-group interaction analysis. Finally, DEV-FAT MS patients presented increased 5-HT-related RS FC in the angular and middle occipital gyri, while this latter region showed decreased 5-HT-related RS FC during the follow-up in F-MS patients. In MS patients, distinct patterns of alterations were observed in monoaminergic networks based on their fatigue status. Fatigue was closely linked to specific changes in the basal ganglia and hippocampal, superior frontal, and middle occipital cortices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.