Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38528059›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2024

Feasibility of a low-cost magnet tracking device in confirming nasogastric tube placement at point of care, a clinical trial.

Hao Li, Kon Voi Tay, Jiajun Liu, Chern Yue Glen Ong, Hau Wei Khoo, Aijin Zhou, Muneaki Miyasaka, Soo Jay Phee

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05204901 (Using Magnetic Field Tracking to Confirm Nasogastric Tube Placement at Point of Care, A Feasibility Study), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05204901 nacompletednot on this map

Using Magnetic Field Tracking to Confirm Nasogastric Tube Placement at Point of Care, A Feasibility Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorTan Tock Seng HospitalRan2022 to 2022Enrolled10ConditionsEnteral and Supplement Feeds Adverse Reaction, Gastrointestinal Diseases, Esophagus DisorderArmsInsertion and withdrawal of a magnetic-tipped wire into the lumen of the nasogastric tube for tracking of its position
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hao Li *Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, 11 Jalan Tan Tock Seng, Singapore, 308433, Singapore. brendenlihao@gmail.com.
Kon Voi Tay *Department of General Surgery, Woodlands Health, Singapore, Singapore.
Jiajun LiuSchool of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.
Chern Yue Glen OngDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Hau Wei KhooDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Aijin ZhouDepartment of Nursing, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Muneaki MiyasakaSchool of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.
Soo Jay PheeSchool of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.
Tan Tock Seng Hospital · SGNanyang Technological University · SGWoodlands Health Campus · SG

Funding

Nanyang Technological University Monetary Academic Research FundNational Healthcare Group Centre for Medical Technology and Innovation (CMTi-21-01-09)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An affordable and reliable way of confirming the placement of nasogastric tube (NGT) at point-of-care is an unmet need. Using a novel algorithm and few sensors, we developed a low-cost magnet tracking device and showed its potential to localize the NGT preclinically. Here, we embark on a first-in-human trial. Six male and 4 female patients with NGT from the general ward of an urban hospital were recruited. We used the device to localize the NGT and compared that against chest X-ray (CXR). In 5 patients, with the sensors placed on the sternal angle, the trajectory of the NGT was reproduced by the tracking device. The tracked location of the NGT deviated from CXR by 0.55 to 1.63 cm, and a downward tracking range of 17 to 22 cm from the sternal angle was achieved. Placing the sensors on the xiphisternum, however, resulted in overt discordance between the device's localization and that on CXR. Short distance between the sternal angle and the xiphisternum, and lower body weight were observed in patients in whom tracking was feasible. Tracking was quick and well tolerated. No adverse event occurred. This device feasibly localized the NGT in 50% of patients when appropriately placed. Further refinement is anticipated.ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05204901.

Indexed as

MagnetsPoint-of-Care SystemsFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansIntubation, GastrointestinalMaleRadiography

Identifiers

PMID38528059
PMCPMC10963729
OpenAlexW4393162331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.