Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38528049›Full record

ArticleJournal of human genetics2024

A mediation analysis framework based on variance component to remove genetic confounding effect.

Zihan Dong, Hongyu Zhao, Andrew T DeWan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of human genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zihan DongDepartment of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA.
Hongyu Zhao *Department of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA. hongyu.zhao@yale.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1195-9607
Andrew T DeWan *Center for Perinatal, Pediatric and Environmental Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA. andrew.dewan@yale.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identification of pleiotropy at the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) level provides valuable insights into shared genetic signals among phenotypes. One approach to study these signals is through mediation analysis, which dissects the total effect of a SNP on the outcome into a direct effect and an indirect effect through a mediator. However, estimated effects from mediation analysis can be confounded by the genetic correlation between phenotypes, leading to inaccurate results. To address this confounding effect in the context of genetic mediation analysis, we propose a restricted-maximum-likelihood (REML)-based mediation analysis framework called REML-mediation, which can be applied to either individual-level or summary statistics data. Simulations demonstrated that REML-mediation provides unbiased estimates of the true cross-trait causal effect, assuming certain assumptions, albeit with a slightly inflated standard error compared to traditional linear regression. To validate the effectiveness of REML-mediation, we applied it to UK Biobank data and analyzed several mediator-outcome trait pairs along with their corresponding sets of pleiotropic SNPs. REML-mediation successfully identified and corrected for genetic confounding effects in these trait pairs, with correction magnitudes ranging from 7% to 39%. These findings highlight the presence of genetic confounding effects in cross-trait epidemiological studies and underscore the importance of accounting for them in data analysis.

Indexed as

Genetic PleiotropyMediation AnalysisModels, GeneticPhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotideComputer SimulationGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansLikelihood Functions

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.