Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38528012›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

Fire suppression makes wildfires more severe and accentuates impacts of climate change and fuel accumulation.

Mark R Kreider, Philip E Higuera, Sean A Parks, William L Rice, Nadia White, Andrew J Larson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
44.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 156 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Prescribed fire is unlikely to reduce net PMProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Optimal interventions to curb urban conflagration.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Egress thresholds and wildfire fatalities.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Fire lines adjacent to aspen are unlikely to hold during extreme burning conditions in southern Rocky Mountain forests.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Rising rates of wildfire building destruction in the conterminous United States.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  19. The role of fire on Earth.Bioscience · 2025
    Review
  20. Wildfires have created instability within risk transfer markets. Here's a path forward.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mark R KreiderDepartment of Forest Management, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, 59812, USA. mark.kreider@umontana.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1518-8267
Philip E HigueraDepartment of Ecosystem and Conservation Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, 59812, USA.
Sean A ParksAldo Leopold Wilderness Research Institute, Rocky Mountain Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Missoula, MT, 59801, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2982-5255
William L RiceDepartment of Society and Conservation, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, 59812, USA.
Nadia WhiteEnvironmental Science and Natural Resource Journalism, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, 59812, USA.
Andrew J LarsonDepartment of Forest Management, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, 59812, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4926-7569
University of Montana · USRocky Mountain Research Station · US

Funding

National Science Foundation (NSF) 1745048
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fire suppression is the primary management response to wildfires in many areas globally. By removing less-extreme wildfires, this approach ensures that remaining wildfires burn under more extreme conditions. Here, we term this the "suppression bias" and use a simulation model to highlight how this bias fundamentally impacts wildfire activity, independent of fuel accumulation and climate change. We illustrate how attempting to suppress all wildfires necessarily means that fires will burn with more severe and less diverse ecological impacts, with burned area increasing at faster rates than expected from fuel accumulation or climate change. Over a human lifespan, the modeled impacts of the suppression bias exceed those from fuel accumulation or climate change alone, suggesting that suppression may exert a significant and underappreciated influence on patterns of fire globally. Managing wildfires to safely burn under low and moderate conditions is thus a critical tool to address the growing wildfire crisis.

Identifiers

PMID38528012
PMCPMC10963776
OpenAlexW4393159767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.