ArticleScientific reports2024
Integrated image and location analysis for wound classification: a deep learning approach.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- A mobile robotic approach to autonomous surface scanning in legal medicine.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026Article
- Computer vision applications in vascular surgery: a systematic review and critical appraisal.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Machine Learning Applications for Venous Ulcer Assessment and Wound Care: A Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Design and evaluation of a remote damage control surgery real-time guidance system based on HoloLens 2 in low-speed network environments.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Predicting wound healing outcomes: a comparative accuracy analysis of AI-driven indices and percent area reduction.BMJ digital health & AI · 2026Article
- Stem Cell and Exosome Therapy in Wound Healing: Traps, Paradoxes, and Tricks Transforming Paradigms.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Advances in Image-Based Diagnosis of Diabetic Foot Ulcers Using Deep Learning and Machine Learning: A Systematic Review.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Machine learning model to classify chronic leg wounds and identify pyoderma gangrenosum.BMJ health & care informatics · 2025Article
- Interpreting Venous and Arterial Ulcer Images Through the Grad-CAM Lens: Insights and Implications in CNN-Based Wound Image Classification.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Enhancing chronic wound assessment through agreement analysis and tissue segmentation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Eff-ReLU-Net: a deep learning framework for multiclass wound classification.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Gaussian random fields as an abstract representation of patient metadata for multimodal medical image segmentation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A review of recent artificial intelligence for traditional medicine.Journal of traditional and complementary medicine · 2025Review
- Article
- Chronic Ulcers Healing Prediction through Machine Learning Approaches: Preliminary Results on Diabetic Foot Ulcers Case Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence to Diagnose Complications of Diabetes.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2025Review
- Article
- Differentiation of Low and High-Grade Meningiomas Using Transfer Learning on MR Images.Healthcare technology lettersArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The global burden of acute and chronic wounds presents a compelling case for enhancing wound classification methods, a vital step in diagnosing and determining optimal treatments. Recognizing this need, we introduce an innovative multi-modal network based on a deep convolutional neural network for categorizing wounds into four categories: diabetic, pressure, surgical, and venous ulcers. Our multi-modal network uses wound images and their corresponding body locations for more precise classification. A unique aspect of our methodology is incorporating a body map system that facilitates accurate wound location tagging, improving upon traditional wound image classification techniques. A distinctive feature of our approach is the integration of models such as VGG16, ResNet152, and EfficientNet within a novel architecture. This architecture includes elements like spatial and channel-wise Squeeze-and-Excitation modules, Axial Attention, and an Adaptive Gated Multi-Layer Perceptron, providing a robust foundation for classification. Our multi-modal network was trained and evaluated on two distinct datasets comprising relevant images and corresponding location information. Notably, our proposed network outperformed traditional methods, reaching an accuracy range of 74.79-100% for Region of Interest (ROI) without location classifications, 73.98-100% for ROI with location classifications, and 78.10-100% for whole image classifications. This marks a significant enhancement over previously reported performance metrics in the literature. Our results indicate the potential of our multi-modal network as an effective decision-support tool for wound image classification, paving the way for its application in various clinical contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.