Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38527605›Full record

Trial reportAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology2024

Defining success after surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence.

Rubin Raju, Annetta M Madsen, Brian J Linder, John A Occhino, John B Gebhart, Michaela E McGree, Amy L Weaver, Emanuel C Trabuco

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00934999 (A Randomized Comparison of Concomitant Incontinence Procedures Performed With Abdominal Sacral Colpopexy), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00934999 phase4completednot on this map

A Randomized Comparison of Concomitant Incontinence Procedures Performed With Abdominal Sacral Colpopexy: the Burch Versus Mid-urethral Sling Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorMayo ClinicRan2009 to 2015Enrolled113ConditionsUrinary IncontinenceArmsBurch urethropexy, Synthetic mid-urethral sling (TVT)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rubin RajuDivision of Urogynecology, Mayo Clinic School of Graduate Medical Education, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN.
Annetta M MadsenDivisions of Urogynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Brian J LinderDivisions of Urogynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
John A OcchinoDivisions of Urogynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
John B GebhartDivisions of Urogynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Michaela E McGreeClinical Trials and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Amy L WeaverClinical Trials and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Emanuel C TrabucoDivisions of Urogynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. Electronic address: trabuco.emanuel@mayo.edu.
Mayo Clinic in Arizona · USMayo Clinic · US

Funding

Mayo Clinic Center for Translational Science ActivitiesUL1TR000135 · NCATS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI KHOSLA, SUNDEEP · 2012 to 2015
$41.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000135NIA NIH HHS L30 AG034837
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA consensus standardized definition of success after stress urinary incontinence surgical treatment is lacking, which precludes comparisons between studies and affects patient counseling.

objectiveThis study aimed to identify optimal patient-centric definition(s) of success after stress urinary incontinence surgical treatment and to compare the identified "more accurate" treatment success definitions with a commonly used composite definition of success (ie, no reported urine leakage, negative cough stress test result, and no retreatment). STUDY

designWe evaluated 51 distinct treatment success definitions for participants enrolled in a previously conducted randomized trial of stress urinary incontinence treatments concomitantly performed with sacrocolpopexy (NCT00934999). For each treatment success definition, we calculated the mean (SD) of participant-assessed symptom improvement and participant-assessed surgical success scores with an 11-point Likert scale among those achieving success and failure. The "more accurate" treatment success definition(s) were identified by measuring the magnitude of the mean difference of participant assessments with Hedges g values. The treatment success definitions with the highest Hedges g values were considered "more accurate" treatment success definitions and were then compared with the composite definition of success.

resultsThe percentage of participants who had treatment success (6.4% to 97.3%) and Hedges g values (-4.85 to 1.25) varied greatly according to each treatment success definition. An International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form score ≤5, Urogenital Distress Inventory-6 score ≤33.3, and a no/mild stress urinary incontinence response on Urogenital Distress Inventory-6 question 3 had the highest Hedges g values and were considered the top 3 "more accurate" treatment success definitions. Paradoxically, treatment success definitions that required a negative cough stress test result or no persistent urinary leakage greatly reduced the ability to differentiate between participant-assessed symptom improvement and surgical success. When the "more accurate" treatment success definitions were compared with the composite definition, patients with failed treatment according to the composite definition had lower Urinary Impact Questionnaire-7 scores and a higher proportion of survey responses indicating complete satisfaction or some level of satisfaction and very good/perfect bladder condition. In addition, the composite definition had considerably fewer favorable outcomes for participants than did the top 3 "more accurate" treatment success definitions.

conclusionSuccessful outcomes of stress urinary incontinence surgical treatments for women undergoing concurrent sacrocolpopexy varied greatly depending on the definition used. However, stringent definitions (requiring complete dryness) and objective testing (negative cough stress test result) had decreased, rather than increased, participant-assessed symptom improvement and surgical success scores. The "more accurate" treatment success definitions better differentiated between participant-assessed symptom improvement and surgical success than the composite definition. The composite definition disproportionately misidentified participants who reported minor symptoms or complete/partial satisfaction with their outcome as having treatment failures and yielded a considerably lower proportion of women who reported favorable outcomes than did the top 3 "more accurate" treatment success definitions.

Indexed as

Urinary Incontinence, StressAgedFemaleHumansMiddle AgedSuburethral SlingsTreatment OutcomeBurch retropubic urethropexymidurethral slingpatient outcomesquality of liferetropubic midurethral sling placementstress urinary incontinencesurgical outcomestreatment success

Identifiers

PMID38527605
PMCPMC11283962
OpenAlexW4394762571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.