Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38527300›Full record

ArticleSingapore medical journal2024

Medical education and physician training in the era of artificial intelligence.

Yueyuan Xu, Zehua Jiang, Daniel Shu Wei Ting, Alfred Wei Chieh Kow, Fernando Bello, Josip Car, Yih-Chung Tham, Tien Yin Wong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Singapore medical journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. [Medical education and artificial intelligence: perspectives and ethical challenges].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2025
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. AI In Leukemia Diagnostics: Complementing the Pathologist's Role.International journal of laboratory hematology · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Are Psychiatry Faculty Prepared to Guide AI Use? A National Survey.Academic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yueyuan XuTsinghua Medicine, School of Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Zehua JiangTsinghua Medicine, School of Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Daniel Shu Wei TingSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore.
Alfred Wei Chieh KowDepartment of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Fernando BelloTechnology Enhanced Learning and Innovation Department, Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Josip CarCentre for Population Health Sciences, Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
Yih-Chung ThamSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore.
Tien Yin WongTsinghua Medicine, School of Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractWith the rise of generative artificial intelligence (AI) and AI-powered chatbots, the landscape of medicine and healthcare is on the brink of significant transformation. This perspective delves into the prospective influence of AI on medical education, residency training and the continuing education of attending physicians or consultants. We begin by highlighting the constraints of the current education model, challenges in limited faculty, uniformity amidst burgeoning medical knowledge and the limitations in 'traditional' linear knowledge acquisition. We introduce 'AI-assisted' and 'AI-integrated' paradigms for medical education and physician training, targeting a more universal, accessible, high-quality and interconnected educational journey. We differentiate between essential knowledge for all physicians, specialised insights for clinician-scientists and mastery-level proficiency for clinician-computer scientists. With the transformative potential of AI in healthcare and service delivery, it is poised to reshape the pedagogy of medical education and residency training.

Indexed as

Education, MedicalPhysiciansArtificial IntelligenceEducation, ContinuingHumansProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID38527300
PMCPMC11060639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.