Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38527001›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Clinical validation of RCSMS: A rapid and sensitive CRISPR-Cas12a test for the molecular detection of SARS-CoV-2 from saliva.

Joaquín Abugattas-Núñez Del Prado, Angélica Quintana Reyes, Julio Leon, Juan Blume La Torre, Renzo Gutiérrez Loli, Alejandro Pinzón Olejua, Elena Rocío Chamorro Chirinos, Félix Antonio Loza Mauricio, Jorge L Maguiña, Piere Rodriguez-Aliaga and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. RT-LAMP CRISPR-Cas12/13-Based SARS-CoV-2 Detection Methods.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Joaquín Abugattas-Núñez Del PradoFacultad de Ciencias y Filosofía, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Perú.ORCID 0000-0002-1157-8452
Angélica Quintana ReyesFacultad de Ciencias y Filosofía, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Perú.
Julio LeonIMS RIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences, Japan.
Juan Blume La TorreFacultad de Ciencias y Filosofía, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Perú.
Renzo Gutiérrez LoliFacultad de Ciencias y Filosofía, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Perú.ORCID 0000-0001-6466-5288
Alejandro Pinzón OlejuaDepartment of Computer Science, Christian-Albrecht University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Elena Rocío Chamorro ChirinosHospital Nacional Guillermo Almenara Yrigoyen, EsSalud, Lima, Perú.
Félix Antonio Loza MauricioHospital Nacional Edgardo Rebagliati Martins, EsSalud, Lima, Perú.
Jorge L MaguiñaInstituto de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud e Investigación (IETSI), EsSalud, Lima, Perú.ORCID 0000-0002-4136-7795
Piere Rodriguez-AliagaDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3828-4235
Edward Málaga-TrilloFacultad de Ciencias y Filosofía, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Perú.ORCID 0000-0001-6230-0832
Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia · PEChristian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel · DEEsSALUD · PEHospital Base Guillermo Almenara Irigoyen · PEHospital Nacional Cayetano Heredia · PEStanford University · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peru's holds the highest COVID death rate per capita worldwide. Key to this outcome is the lack of robust, rapid, and accurate molecular tests to circumvent the elevated costs and logistics of SARS-CoV-2 detection via RT-qPCR. To facilitate massive and timely COVID-19 testing in rural and socioeconomically deprived contexts, we implemented and validated RCSMS, a rapid and sensitive CRISPR-Cas12a test for the molecular detection of SARS-CoV-2 from saliva. RCSMS uses the power of CRISPR-Cas technology and lateral flow strips to easily visualize the presence of SARS-CoV-2 even in laboratories with limited equipment. We show that a low-cost thermochemical treatment with TCEP/EDTA is sufficient to inactivate viral particles and cellular nucleases in saliva, eliminating the need to extract viral RNA with commercial kits, as well as the cumbersome nasopharyngeal swab procedure and the requirement of biosafety level 2 laboratories for molecular analyses. Notably, RCSMS performed outstandingly in a clinical validation done with 352 patients from two hospitals in Lima, detecting as low as 50 viral copies per 10 μl reaction in 40 min, with sensitivity and specificity of 96.5% and 99.0%, respectively, relative to RT-qPCR. The negative and positive predicted values obtained from this field validation indicate that RCSMS can be confidently deployed in both high and low prevalence settings. Like other CRISPR-Cas-based biosensors, RCSMS can be easily reprogrammed for the detection of new SARS-CoV-2 variants. We conclude that RCSMS is a fast, efficient and inexpensive alternative to RT-qPCR for expanding COVID-19 testing capacity in Peru and other low- and middle-income countries with precarious healthcare systems.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2Clinical Laboratory TechniquesCOVID-19 TestingCRISPR-Cas SystemsHumansNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesRNA, ViralSalivaSensitivity and SpecificityRNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID38527001
PMCPMC10962837
OpenAlexW4393150067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.