Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38526998›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Mating dynamics of a sperm-limited drosophilid, Zaprionus indianus.

Jennifer M Gleason, Barnabas Danborno, Marena Nigro, Henry Escobar, Micalea J Cobbs

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jennifer M GleasonDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0544-3404
Barnabas DanbornoDepartment of Anatomy, Faculty of Basic Medical Sciences, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria.
Marena NigroUndergraduate Biology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, United States of America.
Henry EscobarUndergraduate Biology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, United States of America.
Micalea J CobbsDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, United States of America.ORCID 0009-0002-1793-4267
University of Kansas · USAhmadu Bello University · NG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When males have large sperm, they may become sperm limited and mating dynamics may be affected. One such species is Zaprionus indianus, a drosophilid that is an introduced pest species in the Americas. We examined aspects of mating behavior in Z. indianus to determine the senses necessary for mating and measure female and male remating habits. We found that vision is necessary for successful copulation, but wings, which produce courtship song, are not needed. Males need their foretarsi to successfully copulate and although the foretarsi may be needed for chemoreception, their role in hanging on to the female during copulation may be more important for successful mating. Females that mate once run out of sperm in approximately five days, although mating a second time greatly increases offspring production. Females do not seem to exert pre-mating choice among males with respect to mating with a familiar versus a novel male. Males are not capable of mating continuously and fail to produce offspring in many copulations. Overall, females of this species benefit from polyandry, providing an opportunity to study sexual selection in females. In addition, the dynamics of male competition for fertilizing eggs needs to be studied.

Indexed as

DrosophilidaeSexual Behavior, AnimalAnimalsCopulationFemaleMaleReproductionSemenSpermatozoa

Identifiers

PMID38526998
PMCPMC10962835
OpenAlexW4393163993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.