Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38526947›Full record

ArticleInternational forum of allergy & rhinology2024

Detection of plagiarism among rhinology scientific journals.

Ezer H Benaim, Saima Wase, Saif Zaidi, Aurelia Monk, Cristine Klatt-Cromwell, Brian D Thorp, Charles S Ebert, Adam J Kimple, Brent A Senior

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International forum of allergy & rhinology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ezer H BenaimDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8190-0091
Saima WaseDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Saif ZaidiSchool of Medicine, University of Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Aurelia MonkDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Cristine Klatt-CromwellDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Brian D ThorpDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Charles S EbertDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Adam J KimpleDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1670-8401
Brent A SeniorDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1503-3150

Funding

Research Training in OtolaryngologyT32DC005360 · NIDCD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI MANIS, PAUL B · 2003 to 2023
$2.8M
NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC005360
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key pointsAutomated plagiarism-checking software can be a valuable tool for detecting plagiarism in manuscripts. Twenty-five of 60 articles (42%) had at least one incidence of plagiarism, predominately text recycling. A "similarity score" ranging from 22% to 35% could be a potential cut-off value when screening submitted manuscripts.

Indexed as

Periodicals as TopicPlagiarismHumansOtolaryngologySoftwareevidence‐based medicineiThenticaterhinology workforcesimilarity score

Identifiers

PMID38526947
PMCPMC11293991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.