ArticleGlobal spine journal2024
Timing of Decompressive Surgery in Patients With Acute Spinal Cord Injury: Systematic Review Update.
Article in Global spine journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association between surgical timing and neurological recovery after traumatic spinal cord injury.European journal of medical research · 2025Pooled it
- Impact of ultra-early, early and delayed decompression on neurological and clinical outcomes in spinal cord injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis.The journal of spinal cord medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Clinical Practice Guideline: The Diagnosis and Treatment of AcuteSpinal Cord Injury.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2025Guideline
- Tracing the evolving dynamics and research hotspots of spinal cord injury and surgical decompression from 1975 to 2024: a bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Pooled it
- Optimal timing of surgical decompression for acute cervical spinal cord injury: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.Frontiers in neurologyPooled it
- Three-Grade Neurological Recovery (ASIA Impairment Scale A to D) Following Surgical Stabilization of Traumatic D11-D12 Meyerding Grade IV Spondylolisthesis: A Case Report.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2026Article
- Impact of early versus delayed surgery on 30-day outcomes in traumatic cervical spinal cord injury: a single-center propensity score-matched cohort study.European journal of medical research · 2026Article
- Minocycline in Acute Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review and Exploratory Meta-Analysis of Preclinical and Clinical Evidence.Archives of academic emergency medicine · 2026Review
- Clinical Recommendations for the Acute Care of Patients With Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2025Review
- The race against time: patterns and variables of spine surgery timing in traumatic spinal cord injury: a retrospective cohort study from the TraumaRegister DGU®.Neurological research and practice · 2025Article
- Surgical Timing After Spinal Cord Injury: A Narrative Review of Current Evidence and Perspectives.Korean journal of neurotrauma · 2025Review
- Spinal cord injury in severely injured patients: results from the Swiss Trauma Registry.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Early versus Delayed Surgical Decompression in Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Asian journal of neurosurgery · 2025Review
- Overview of Cervical Spine Injuries Caused by Diving Into Shallow Water on Jeju Island: A 9-Year Retrospective Study in a Regional Trauma Center.Korean journal of neurotrauma · 2025Article
- Management of traumatic spinal cord injury in the Nordic countries: a multidisciplinary survey.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Impact of early decompression surgery and injury characteristics on neurological recovery following traumatic cervical spinal cord injury.Brain & spine · 2025Article
- Application of Neurophysiological Monitoring and Ultrasound Guidance in Intramedullary Decompression for Acute Spinal Cord Injury.International journal of general medicine · 2025Article
- Epidemiology of Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury in Southeast Norway.Neurotrauma reports · 2025Article
- Mechanisms of Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury AIS Grade Conversion.Neurotrauma reports · 2025Review
- A laminin-based therapy for dogs with chronic spinal cord injury: promising results of a longitudinal trial.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors at 12 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
STUDY
designSystematic review and meta-analysis.
objectiveSurgical decompression is a cornerstone in the management of patients with traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI); however, the influence of the timing of surgery on neurological recovery after acute SCI remains controversial. This systematic review aims to summarize current evidence on the effectiveness, safety, and cost-effectiveness of early (≤24 hours) or late (>24 hours) surgery in patients with acute traumatic SCI for all levels of the spine. Furthermore, this systematic review aims to evaluate the evidence with respect to the impact of ultra-early surgery (earlier than 24 hours from injury) on these outcomes.
methodsA systematic search of the literature was performed using the MEDLINE database (PubMed), Cochrane database, and EMBASE. Two reviewers independently screened the citations from the search to determine whether an article satisfied predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. For all key questions, we focused on primary studies with the least potential for bias and those that controlled for baseline neurological status and specified time from injury to surgery. Risk of bias of each article was assessed using standardized tools based on study design. Finally, the overall strength of evidence for the primary outcomes was assessed using the GRADE approach. Data were synthesized both qualitatively and quantitively using meta-analyses.
resultsTwenty-one studies met inclusion and exclusion criteria and formed the evidence base for this review update. Seventeen studies compared outcomes between patients treated with early (≤24 hours from injury) compared to late (>24 hours) surgical decompression. An additional 4 studies evaluated even earlier time frames: <4, <5, <8 or <12 hours. Based on moderate evidence, patients were 2 times more likely to recover by ≥ 2 grades on the ASIA Impairment Score (AIS) at 6 months (RR: 2.76, 95% CI 1.60 to 4.98) and 12 months (RR: 1.95, 95% CI 1.26 to 3.18) if they were decompressed within 24 hours compared to after 24 hours. Furthermore, moderate evidence suggested that patients receiving early decompression had an additional 4.50 (95% CI 1.70 to 7.29) point improvement on the ASIA motor score. With respect to administrative outcomes, there was low evidence that early decompression may decrease acute hospital length of stay. In terms of safety, there was moderate evidence that suggested the rate of major complications does not differ between patients undergoing early compared to late surgery. Furthermore, there was no difference in rates of mortality, surgical device-related complications, sepsis/systemic infection or neurological deterioration based on timing of surgery. Firm conclusions were not possible with respect to the impact of ultra-early surgery on neurological, functional or safety outcomes given the poor-quality studies, imprecision and the overlap in the time frames examined.
conclusionsThis review provides an evidence base to support the update on clinical practice guidelines related to the timing of surgical decompression in acute SCI. Overall, the strength of evidence was moderate that early surgery (≤24 hours from injury) compared to late (>24 hours) results in clinically meaningful improvements in neurological recovery. Further studies are required to delineate the role of ultra-early surgery in patients with acute SCI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.