ReviewJournal of food and drug analysis2023
Therapeutic effects of orally administration of viable and inactivated probiotic strains against murine urinary tract infection.
Review in Journal of food and drug analysis, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Probiotic and Postbiotic Interactions ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Oral Administration of Heat-Killed Multi-Strain Probiotics Confers Durable Protection Against Antibiotic-Resistant Primary and Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections in a Murine Model.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Probiotics: A multifaceted approach to health promotion-from disease prevention to food enrichment and delivery systems.AIMS microbiology · 2025Review
- Probiotics and human health: biological activities, nutritional aspects, immunomodulatory properties, applications, and future perspectives - a comprehensive review.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Assessing the Influence of Urine pH on the Efficacy of Ciprofloxacin and Fosfomycin in Immunocompetent and Immunocompromised Murine Models ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Evaluation of a Standard Dietary Regimen Combined with Heat-InactivatedFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- A comprehensive review of probiotics and human health-current prospective and applications.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are highly prevalent bacterial infections that pose significant health risks. Specific probiotic strains have been recommended for UTI control and management of antibiotic resistance. Otherwise, para-probiotics, defined as inactivated probiotic cells, offer potential advantages by minimizing risks associated with live microorganisms. However, the effectiveness of heat-killed probiotic strains against UTIs remains uncertain. Additionally, lactoferrin (LF), an iron-binding glycoprotein, exhibits immunomodulatory, antimicrobial, and anti-inflammatory properties. Recently, we had developed recombinant LF-expression probiotics, which can display considerate antibacterial activities against select food-borne pathogens in vitro. Thus, the present study aimed to evaluate the antibacterial activities of heat-killed natural and recombinant LF-expressing probiotics against UTIs in vitro and in vivo. Firstly, using in vitro assays, we assessed the antibacterial activity of heat-killed natural and recombinant LF-expressing probiotics against uropathogenic Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Among the tested probiotics, 10 heat-killed LF-expressing strains displayed superior antibacterial efficacy compared to 12 natural probiotics. Based on their potent in vitro activity, selected probiotics were formulated into three probiotic mixtures: viable probiotic mixture (LAB), heat-killed probiotic mixture (HK-LAB), and heat-killed LF-expressing probiotic mixture (HK-LAB/LF). To further evaluate the therapeutic potential of these probiotic mixtures in vivo, we established a murine model of UTIs by intraurethral administration of E. coli to 40 female C57BL/6JNarl mice on day 0. Subsequently, mice received oral gavage of placebo, LAB, HK-LAB, or HK-LAB/LF for 21 consecutive days (n = 8 per group). An additional control group (n = 8) received ampicillin treatment for 7 days. To assess protective effects against re-infection or UTI relapse, all mice were challenged with E. coli on day 22 and E. coli plus K. pneumoniae on day 25. Results from the murine UTI model demonstrated that placebo administration did not reduce bacteriuria throughout the experiment. Conversely, supplementation with ampicillin, HK-LAB/LF, HK-LAB, or LAB significantly (p < 0.05) reduced daily bacteriuria by 103 to 104-fold on days 1, 3, 5, and 14, respectively. Furthermore, all four therapeutic treatments improved the bacteriological cure rate (BCR) with varying levels of efficacy. For the 7-day treatment course, the BCR was 25% (placebo), 62.5% (ampicillin), 37.5% (LAB), 37.5% (HK-LAB), and 62.5% (HK-LAB/LF). For the 21-day treatment course, the BCR was 25% (placebo), 75% (ampicillin), 37.5% (LAB), 37.5% (HK-LAB), and 75% (HK-LAB/LF). Notably, HK-LAB and HK-LAB/LF demonstrated superior therapeutic efficacy compared to viable LAB in treating UTIs. Overall, regarding BCR, the three probiotic mixtures can provide benefits against UTI in mice, but ampicillin therapy remains the most efficient among the four treatments. Furthermore, there was no significant difference between pre- and post-challenge courses for the two instances of re-challenging uropathogens in all mice groups, as bacteriuria levels remained below 103 CFU/mL, implying that adaptive responses of mice may help reduce the risk of recurrent UTIs. In conclusion, our results provide new evidence that oral administration of heat-killed probiotic mixtures can confer significant therapeutic efficacy against UTIs in a murine model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.