Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38526785›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2024

Practicalities of Cell Sorting.

Mark Cheetham, Derek Davies, Christopher Hall, Charlotte Christie Petersen, Reiner Schulte, Rachael Walker

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Mark Cheetham, Cambridge, UK.
Derek DaviesFrancis Crick Institute, London, UK.
Christopher HallFlow Cytometry Facility, Babraham Institute, Cambridge, UK.
Charlotte Christie PetersenThe FACS Core Facility, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Reiner SchulteFlow Cytometry Facility, Cambridge Institute for Medical Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Rachael WalkerFlow Cytometry Facility, Babraham Institute, Cambridge, UK. rachael.walker@babraham.ac.uk.
Babraham Institute · GBAarhus University · DKThe Francis Crick Institute · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell sorting is a technique commonly used in academic and biotechnology laboratories in order to separate out cells or particles of interest from heterogeneous populations. Cell sorters use the same principles as flow cytometry analyzers, but instead of cell populations passing to the waste of the instrument, they can be collected for further studies including DNA sequencing as well as other genomic, in vitro and in vivo experiments. This chapter aims to give an overview of cell sorting, the different types of cell sorters, details on how a cell sorter works, as well as protocols that are useful when embarking on a journey with cell sorting.

Indexed as

LaboratoriesCell SeparationFlow CytometryCell sortingFlow cytometryFluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS)

Identifiers

PMID38526785
OpenAlexW4393151865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.