Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38526701›Full record

ArticleNeuroinformatics2024

DeepN4: Learning N4ITK Bias Field Correction for T1-weighted Images.

Praitayini Kanakaraj, Tianyuan Yao, Leon Y Cai, Ho Hin Lee, Nancy R Newlin, Michael E Kim, Chenyu Gao, Kimberly R Pechman, Derek Archer, Timothy Hohman and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Multi-Architecture Deep Learning for Early Alzheimer's Detection in MRI: Slice- and Scan-Level Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Praitayini KanakarajDepartment of Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, 400 24th Ave S, Nashville, TN, 37240, USA. praitayini.kanakaraj@vanderbilt.edu.
Tianyuan YaoDepartment of Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, 400 24th Ave S, Nashville, TN, 37240, USA.
Leon Y CaiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Ho Hin LeeDepartment of Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, 400 24th Ave S, Nashville, TN, 37240, USA.
Nancy R NewlinDepartment of Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, 400 24th Ave S, Nashville, TN, 37240, USA.
Michael E KimDepartment of Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, 400 24th Ave S, Nashville, TN, 37240, USA.
Chenyu GaoDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Kimberly R PechmanVanderbilt Memory and Alzheimer's Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Derek ArcherVanderbilt Memory and Alzheimer's Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Timothy HohmanVanderbilt Memory and Alzheimer's Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Angela JeffersonVanderbilt Memory and Alzheimer's Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Lori L Beason-HeldLaboratory of Behavioral Neuroscience, National Institute On Aging, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Susan M ResnickLaboratory of Behavioral Neuroscience, National Institute On Aging, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI)
BIOCARD Study Team
Eleftherios GaryfallidisIntelligent Systems Engineering, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
Adam AndersonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Kurt G SchillingVanderbilt University Institute for Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Bennett A LandmanDepartment of Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, 400 24th Ave S, Nashville, TN, 37240, USA.
Daniel MoyerDepartment of Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, 400 24th Ave S, Nashville, TN, 37240, USA.

Funding

Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative - SupplementU01AG024904 · NIA · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE RES &EDUC · PI WEINER, MICHAEL W · 2004 to 2015
$121.0M
Smartphone-Based "Burst" Cognitive AssessmentsP01AG003991 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Carlos Cruchaga · 1985 to 2026
$69.5M
The natural history of AB accumulation in preclinical ADP01AG026276 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MORRIS, JOHN · 2005 to 2025
$49.5M
National Alzheimer's Coordinating CenterU24AG072122 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI STEPHENS, KARI A · 2021 to 2025
$45.8M
VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY CTSA FOR PEDIATRIC RESEARCHUL1RR024975 · NCRR · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI BERNARD, GORDON RAPHAEL · 2007 to 2011
$45.7M
The Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (VICTR)UL1TR000445 · NCATS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BERNARD, GORDON RAPHAEL · 2012 to 2016
$41.4M
Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational SciencesUL1TR000448 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EVANOFF, BRADLEY A · 2012 to 2016
$41.4M
MVP Data Integration into the ADSP Phenotype Harmonization ConsortiumU24AG074855 · NIA · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI CUCCARO, MICHAEL L, HOHMAN, TIMOTHY J · 2021 to 2025
$37.5M
Research Education ComponentP30AG062422 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Gil Dan Rabinovici · 2019 to 2026
$36.9M
Research Education ComponentP30AG062421 · NIA · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI Teresa Gomez-Isla · 2019 to 2026
$36.5M
UCSD Shiley-Marcos Alzheimer's Disease Research Center P30P30AG062429 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Mark W Bondi · 2019 to 2026
$34.9M
Mapping the Human Connectome: Structure, Function, and HeritabilityU54MH091657 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI UGURBIL, KAMIL, VAN ESSEN, DAVID C · 2010 to 2014
$34.7M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000445NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000448NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024975NIA NIH HHS K01 AG073584NIA NIH HHS P01 AG003991NIA NIH HHS P01 AG026276NIA NIH HHS P20 AG068024NIA NIH HHS P20 AG068053NIA NIH HHS P20 AG068077NIA NIH HHS P20 AG068082NIA NIH HHS P30 AG062421NIA NIH HHS P30 AG062422NIA NIH HHS P30 AG062429NIA NIH HHS P30 AG062677NIA NIH HHS P30 AG062715NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066444NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066462NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066468NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066506NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066507NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066508NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066509NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066511NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066512NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066514NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066515NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066518NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066519NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066530NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066546NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072931NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072946NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072947NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072958NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072959NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072972NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072973NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072975NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072976NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072977NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072978NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072979NIA NIH HHS R01 AG034962NIA NIH HHS R01 AG043434NIA NIH HHS R01 AG056534NIA NIH HHS R01 AG062826NIA NIH HHS R01 AG079280NIA NIH HHS U01 AG024904NIA NIH HHS U01 AG033655NIA NIH HHS U24 AG072122NIA NIH HHS U24 AG074855NIBIB NIH HHS K01 EB032898NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB009352NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB017230NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB027585NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD103537NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007347NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM152284NIH HHS S10 OD021771NIH HHS S10 OD023680NIMH NIH HHS U54 MH091657
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

T1-weighted (T1w) MRI has low frequency intensity artifacts due to magnetic field inhomogeneities. Removal of these biases in T1w MRI images is a critical preprocessing step to ensure spatially consistent image interpretation. N4ITK bias field correction, the current state-of-the-art, is implemented in such a way that makes it difficult to port between different pipelines and workflows, thus making it hard to reimplement and reproduce results across local, cloud, and edge platforms. Moreover, N4ITK is opaque to optimization before and after its application, meaning that methodological development must work around the inhomogeneity correction step. Given the importance of bias fields correction in structural preprocessing and flexible implementation, we pursue a deep learning approximation / reinterpretation of the N4ITK bias fields correction to create a method which is portable, flexible, and fully differentiable. In this paper, we trained a deep learning network "DeepN4" on eight independent cohorts from 72 different scanners and age ranges with N4ITK-corrected T1w MRI and bias field for supervision in log space. We found that we can closely approximate N4ITK bias fields correction with naïve networks. We evaluate the peak signal to noise ratio (PSNR) in test dataset against the N4ITK corrected images. The median PSNR of corrected images between N4ITK and DeepN4 was 47.96 dB. In addition, we assess the DeepN4 model on eight additional external datasets and show the generalizability of the approach. This study establishes that incompatible N4ITK preprocessing steps can be closely approximated by naïve deep neural networks, facilitating more flexibility. All code and models are released at https://github.com/MASILab/DeepN4 .

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingAlgorithmsBiasNeural Networks, Computer3D U-NetBias field correctionInhomogeneityN4ITKT1-weighted images

Identifiers

PMID38526701
PMCPMC11182041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.