Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38526621›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of clinical oncology2024

Optimal timing of prophylactic pegylated G-CSF after chemotherapy administration for patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis from Clinical Practice Guidelines for the use of G-CSF 2022.

Yukinori Ozaki, Takamichi Yokoe, Tetsuhiro Yoshinami, Kazuki Nozawa, Hiroshi Nishio, Kenji Tsuchihashi, Eiki Ichihara, Yuji Miura, Makoto Endo, Shingo Yano and 17 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of clinical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors at 19 institutions in 1 country.

Yukinori OzakiDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31, Araike, Kotou-Ku, Tokyo, Japan. yukinori.ozaki@jfcr.or.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8064-648X
Takamichi YokoeDepartment of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Tetsuhiro YoshinamiDepartment of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.
Kazuki NozawaDepartment of Center for Cancer Genomics and Advanced Therapeutics, Breast Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Hiroshi NishioDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Kenji TsuchihashiDepartment of Hematology, Oncology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
Eiki IchiharaCenter for Clinical Oncology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan.
Yuji MiuraDepartment of Medical Oncology, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Makoto EndoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Shingo YanoDivision of Clinical Oncology/Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Dai MaruyamaDepartment of Hematology Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Nobuyuki SusumuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, International University of Health and Welfare Narita Hospital, Chiba, Japan.
Munetaka TakekumaDepartment of Gynecology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.
Takashi MotohashiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokyo Women's Medical University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Mamoru ItoDepartment of Hematology, Oncology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
Eishi BabaDepartment of Oncology and Social Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Nobuaki OchiDepartment of General Internal Medicine 4, Kawasaki Medical School, Okayama, Japan.
Toshio KuboDepartment of Allergy and Respiratory Medicine, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan.
Keita UchinoDepartment of Medical Oncology, NTT Medical Center Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Takahiro KimuraDepartment of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yutaro KamiyamaDepartment of Clinical Oncology/Hematology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Shinji NakaoDepartment of Hematology, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Medical Pharmaceutical and Health Sciences, Kanazawa University, Ishikawa, Japan.
Shinobu TamuraDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Hitomi NishimotoDepartment of Nursing, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan.
Yasuhisa KatoDepartment of Drug Information, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Shonan University of Medical Sciences, Kanagawa, Japan.
Atsushi SatoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Aomori, Japan.
Toshimi TakanoDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31, Araike, Kotou-Ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Jikei University School of Medicine · JPOkayama University Hospital · JPKeio University · JPKyushu University · JPKyushu University Hospital · JPThe Cancer Institute Hospital · JPAichi Cancer Center · JPHirosaki University · JPInternational University of Health and Welfare · JPJapanese Foundation For Cancer Research · JPKanazawa University · JPKawasaki Medical School · JPNTT Medical Center · JPShizuoka Cancer Center · JPShonan University of Medical Sciences · JPThe University of Osaka · JPTokyo Women's Medical University Hospital · JPToranomon Hospital · JPWakayama Medical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe timing of prophylactic pegylated granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) administration during cancer chemotherapy varies, with Day 2 and Days 3-5 being the most common schedules. Optimal timing remains uncertain, affecting efficacy and adverse events. This systematic review sought to evaluate the available evidence on the timing of prophylactic pegylated G-CSF administration.

methodsBased on the Minds Handbook for Clinical Practice Guideline Development, we searched the PubMed, Ichushi-Web, and Cochrane Library databases for literature published from January 1990 to December 2019. The inclusion criteria included studies among the adult population using pegfilgrastim. The search strategy focused on timing-related keywords. Two reviewers independently extracted and assessed the data.

resultsAmong 300 initial search results, only four articles met the inclusion criteria. A meta-analysis for febrile neutropenia incidence suggested a potential higher incidence when pegylated G-CSF was administered on Days 3-5 than on Day 2 (odds ratio: 1.27, 95% CI 0.66-2.46, p = 0.47), with a moderate certainty of evidence. No significant difference in overall survival or mortality due to infections was observed. The trend of severe adverse events was lower on Days 3-5, without statistical significance (odds ratio: 0.72, 95% CI 0.14-3.67, p = 0.69) and with a moderate certainty of evidence. Data on pain were inconclusive.

conclusionsBoth Day 2 and Days 3-5 were weakly recommended for pegylated G-CSF administration post-chemotherapy in patients with cancer. The limited evidence highlights the need for further research to refine recommendations.

Indexed as

Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorNeoplasmsDrug Administration ScheduleFilgrastimHumansPolyethylene GlycolsPractice Guidelines as TopicRecombinant ProteinsTime FactorsFilgrastimGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factorpegfilgrastimpegylated granulocyte colony-stimulating factorPolyethylene GlycolsRecombinant ProteinsFebrile neutropeniaMeta-analysisPegfilgrastimPegylated G-CSF

Identifiers

PMID38526621
OpenAlexW4393150406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.