Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38526480›Full record

ArticleJAMA2024

Differences in Donor Heart Acceptance by Race and Gender of Patients on the Transplant Waiting List.

Khadijah Breathett, Shannon M Knapp, Sabra C Lewsey, Selma F Mohammed, Sula Mazimba, Shannon M Dunlay, Albert Hicks, Onyedika J Ilonze, Alanna A Morris, Ryan J Tedford and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
17.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The association of place-based disadvantage and access to deceased donor heart transplantation.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Advancing Health Equity in the Cardiovascular Device Life Cycle.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2025
    Review
  13. OPTN/SRTR 2023 Annual Data Report: Heart.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Assessing racial disparities in heart transplant allocations post-2018 policy change.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Khadijah BreathettKrannert Cardiovascular Research Center, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis.
Shannon M KnappKrannert Cardiovascular Research Center, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis.
Sabra C LewseyDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Selma F MohammedDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Creighton University, Omaha, Nebraska.
Sula MazimbaDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville.
Shannon M DunlayDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Albert HicksDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore.
Onyedika J IlonzeKrannert Cardiovascular Research Center, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis.
Alanna A MorrisDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Ryan J TedfordDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston.
Monica M ColvinDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Richard C DalyDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USMayo Clinic · USCreighton University · USEmory University · USJohns Hopkins University · USMedical University of South Carolina · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USUniversity of Virginia · US

Funding

Seeking Objectivity in Allocation of Advanced Heart Failure (SOCIAL HF) Therapies TrialR01HL159216 · NHLBI · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI BREATHETT, KHADIJAH · 2022 to 2025
$2.6M
Seeking Objectivity in Allocation of Advanced Heart Failure (SOCIAL HF) Therapies TrialR56HL159216 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI BREATHETT, KHADIJAH · 2021 to 2021
$906k
Addressing Individual Provider Bias and Group Decision-Making in Selection of Advanced Heart Failure Therapies in Racial/Ethnic MinoritiesK01HL142848 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI BREATHETT, KHADIJAH · 2018 to 2021
$858k
NHLBI NIH HHS K01 HL142848NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL159216NHLBI NIH HHS R56 HL159216
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Barriers to heart transplant must be overcome prior to listing. It is unclear why Black men and women remain less likely to receive a heart transplant after listing than White men and women. Objective: To evaluate whether race or gender of a heart transplant candidate (ie, patient on the transplant waiting list) is associated with the probability of a donor heart being accepted by the transplant center team with each offer. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used the United Network for Organ Sharing datasets to identify organ acceptance with each offer for US non-Hispanic Black (hereafter, Black) and non-Hispanic White (hereafter, White) adults listed for heart transplant from October 18, 2018, through March 31, 2023. Exposures: Black or White race and gender (men, women) of a heart transplant candidate. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was heart offer acceptance by the transplant center team. The number of offers to acceptance was assessed using discrete time-to-event analyses, nonparametrically (stratified by race and gender) and parametrically. The hazard probability of offer acceptance for each offer was modeled using generalized linear mixed models adjusted for candidate-, donor-, and offer-level variables. Results: Among 159 177 heart offers with 13 760 donors, there were 14 890 candidates listed for heart transplant; 30.9% were Black, 69.1% were White, 73.6% were men, and 26.4% were women. The cumulative incidence of offer acceptance was highest for White women followed by Black women, White men, and Black men (P < .001). Odds of acceptance were less for Black candidates than for White candidates for the first offer (odds ratio [OR], 0.76; 95% CI, 0.69-0.84) through the 16th offer. Odds of acceptance were higher for women than for men for the first offer (OR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.39-1.68) through the sixth offer and were lower for the 10th through 31st offers. Conclusions and Relevance: The cumulative incidence of heart offer acceptance by a transplant center team was consistently lower for Black candidates than for White candidates of the same gender and higher for women than for men. These disparities persisted after adjusting for candidate-, donor-, and offer-level variables, possibly suggesting racial and gender bias in the decision-making process. Further investigation of site-level decision-making may reveal strategies for equitable donor heart acceptance.

Indexed as

Black or African AmericanHealthcare DisparitiesHeart FailureHeart TransplantationTissue and Organ ProcurementWhiteAdultCohort StudiesFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaleRace FactorsSex FactorsTissue DonorsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID38526480
PMCPMC10964157
OpenAlexW4393144054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.