ArticleJAMA2024
Differences in Donor Heart Acceptance by Race and Gender of Patients on the Transplant Waiting List.
Article in JAMA, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Global strategies to improve equitable access to heart and lung transplantation- ISHLT Consortium Report.JHLT open · 2026Review
- Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Health Literacy, Perception of Health Status, and Access to Healthcare Among Heart Transplant Patients of the National Institutes of Health All of Us Research Program.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2026Article
- Transforming Advanced Heart Failure Programs: Addressing Institutional and Systemic Drivers of Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Care.Circulation. Heart failure · 2026Review
- Heart transplantation graft survival following donation after circulatory death via thoracoabdominal normothermic regional perfusion.JHLT open · 2026Article
- Center and Geographic Variability in Acceptance of the First Donor Heart by Race.Circulation. Heart failure · 2026Article
- Racial, ethnic, and sex disparities in lung transplant waitlist outcomes before and after composite allocation score implementation.JHLT open · 2026Article
- The association of place-based disadvantage and access to deceased donor heart transplantation.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2026Article
- Human atrial skinned muscle fibers exhibit reduced length-dependent activation but show faster force development kinetics than ventricular muscle.Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology · 2026Article
- Contemporary strategies for donor heart preservation in heart transplantation.Frontiers in transplantation · 2026Review
- Review
- Sex Differences in Heart Transplantation: Evolving Trends and Insights.Current cardiology reports · 2025Review
- Advancing Health Equity in the Cardiovascular Device Life Cycle.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2025Review
- OPTN/SRTR 2023 Annual Data Report: Heart.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2025Article
- Improving the Prioritization of Heart Transplantation Candidates for Optimal Clinical Outcomes: A Narrative Review.Current cardiology reports · 2025Review
- Article
- Assessing racial disparities in heart transplant allocations post-2018 policy change.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2024Article
- Lost in Transplantation: Characterizing Racial Gaps in Physician Organ Offer Acceptance.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Peri-and Post-operative Cardiac Surgery.Current cardiovascular risk reports · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
12 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Barriers to heart transplant must be overcome prior to listing. It is unclear why Black men and women remain less likely to receive a heart transplant after listing than White men and women. Objective: To evaluate whether race or gender of a heart transplant candidate (ie, patient on the transplant waiting list) is associated with the probability of a donor heart being accepted by the transplant center team with each offer. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used the United Network for Organ Sharing datasets to identify organ acceptance with each offer for US non-Hispanic Black (hereafter, Black) and non-Hispanic White (hereafter, White) adults listed for heart transplant from October 18, 2018, through March 31, 2023. Exposures: Black or White race and gender (men, women) of a heart transplant candidate. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was heart offer acceptance by the transplant center team. The number of offers to acceptance was assessed using discrete time-to-event analyses, nonparametrically (stratified by race and gender) and parametrically. The hazard probability of offer acceptance for each offer was modeled using generalized linear mixed models adjusted for candidate-, donor-, and offer-level variables. Results: Among 159 177 heart offers with 13 760 donors, there were 14 890 candidates listed for heart transplant; 30.9% were Black, 69.1% were White, 73.6% were men, and 26.4% were women. The cumulative incidence of offer acceptance was highest for White women followed by Black women, White men, and Black men (P < .001). Odds of acceptance were less for Black candidates than for White candidates for the first offer (odds ratio [OR], 0.76; 95% CI, 0.69-0.84) through the 16th offer. Odds of acceptance were higher for women than for men for the first offer (OR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.39-1.68) through the sixth offer and were lower for the 10th through 31st offers. Conclusions and Relevance: The cumulative incidence of heart offer acceptance by a transplant center team was consistently lower for Black candidates than for White candidates of the same gender and higher for women than for men. These disparities persisted after adjusting for candidate-, donor-, and offer-level variables, possibly suggesting racial and gender bias in the decision-making process. Further investigation of site-level decision-making may reveal strategies for equitable donor heart acceptance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.