Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38526099›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2024

Identification of different classes of genome instability suppressor genes through analysis of DNA damage response markers.

Bin-Zhong Li, Richard D Kolodner, Christopher D Putnam

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Clinical application and drug resistance mechanism of gemcitabine.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  3. The micromammals.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bin-Zhong LiLudwig Institute for Cancer Research, San Diego Branch, La Jolla, CA 92093-0669, USA.
Richard D KolodnerLudwig Institute for Cancer Research, San Diego Branch, La Jolla, CA 92093-0669, USA.
Christopher D PutnamLudwig Institute for Cancer Research, San Diego Branch, La Jolla, CA 92093-0669, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6145-1265
University of California San Diego · USLudwig Cancer Research · US

Funding

ENZYMATIC MECHANISMS OF GENETIC RECOMBINATIONR01GM026017 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Richard D Kolodner · 1985 to 2026
$10.5M
Ludwig Institute for Cancer ResearchNIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM026017NIH HHS R01 GM26017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cellular pathways that detect DNA damage are useful for identifying genes that suppress DNA damage, which can cause genome instability and cancer predisposition syndromes when mutated. We identified 199 high-confidence and 530 low-confidence DNA damage-suppressing (DDS) genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae through a whole-genome screen for mutations inducing Hug1 expression, a focused screen for mutations inducing Ddc2 foci, and data from previous screens for mutations causing Rad52 foci accumulation and Rnr3 induction. We also identified 286 high-confidence and 394 low-confidence diverse genome instability-suppressing (DGIS) genes through a whole-genome screen for mutations resulting in increased gross chromosomal rearrangements and data from previous screens for mutations causing increased genome instability as assessed in a diversity of genome instability assays. Genes that suppress both pathways (DDS+ DGIS+) prevent or repair DNA replication damage and likely include genes preventing collisions between the replication and transcription machineries. DDS+ DGIS- genes, including many transcription-related genes, likely suppress damage that is normally repaired properly or prevent inappropriate signaling, whereas DDS- DGIS+ genes, like PIF1, do not suppress damage but likely promote its proper, nonmutagenic repair. Thus, induction of DNA damage markers is not a reliable indicator of increased genome instability, and the DDS and DGIS categories define mechanistically distinct groups of genes.

Indexed as

DNA DamageGenomic InstabilitySaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsDNA RepairGenes, SuppressorGenome, FungalMutationSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsDNA damage signalingDNA repairgenome instability

Identifiers

PMID38526099
PMCPMC11152081
OpenAlexW4393157456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.