Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38525921›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical radiation sciences2024

The impact of a prophylactic skin dressing on surface-guided patient positioning in chest wall Radiation Therapy.

James Cumming, Kenton Thompson, Katrina Woodford, Vanessa Panettieri, Daniel Sapkaroski

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical radiation sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

James CummingDepartment of Radiation Therapy Services, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7037-5313
Kenton ThompsonDepartment of Radiation Therapy Services, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Katrina WoodfordDepartment of Radiation Therapy Services, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Vanessa PanettieriDepartment of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4061-1960
Daniel SapkaroskiDepartment of Radiation Therapy Services, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8094-0817
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre · AUThe University of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSurface-guided radiation therapy (SGRT) has emerged as a powerful tool to improve patient setup accuracy in radiation therapy (RT). Combined with the goal of increasing RT accuracy is an ongoing effort to decrease RT side effects. The application of a prophylactic skin dressing to the treatment site is a well-documented method of reducing skin-related side effects from RT. This paper aims to investigate whether the application of Mepitel, a prophylactic skin dressing, has an impact on the accuracy of surface-guided patient setups in chest wall RT.

methodsA retrospective analysis of daily image-guided Online Corrections (OLCs) from patients undergoing chest wall irradiation with SGRT was performed. Translational (superior-inferior, lateral, and anterior-posterior) OLC magnitude and direction were compared between patients treated with Mepitel applied and those treated without. Systematic and random errors were calculated and compared between groups.

resultsOLCs from 275 fractions were analysed. Mean OLCs were larger for patients with Mepitel applied in the superior_inferior axis (0.34 vs. 0.22 cm, P = 0.049) and for the combined translational vector (0.54 vs. 0.43 cm, P = 0.043). Combined translational systematic error was slightly larger for patients with Mepitel applied (0.15 vs. 0.09 cm).

conclusionMepitel can impact the accuracy of SGRT patient-positioning in chest wall RT. The variation however is small and unlikely to have any clinical impact if SGRT is coupled with image guidance and appropriate PTV margins. Further investigation is required to assess the effect of Mepitel on SGRT accuracy in other treatment sites, as well as any potential dosimetric impacts.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsBreast Neoplasms, MaleOcclusive DressingsPatient PositioningRadiotherapy, Image-GuidedSiliconesThoracic WallAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMastectomyMiddle AgedRadiodermatitismepitelSiliconesBreastchest wallMepitelradiation therapyradiotherapyskin dressingsurface guided radiation therapy

Identifiers

PMID38525921
PMCPMC11177042
OpenAlexW4393153156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.