ArticleLab on a chip2024
Integrated biocompatible 3D printed isoporous membranes with 7 μm pores.
Article in Lab on a chip, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Vacuum-enhanced high-resolution 3D printing yields 11 200 valves and uniform 7 μm isoporous membranes.Lab on a chip · 2026Article
- Automated Flushing System for Post-Processing in Microfluidic Device Fabrication.Micromachines · 2026Article
- Fast multi-resolution 3D printing of microfluidics: enabling 2 μm channels and ultra-compact mixers.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2026Article
- Integrating Optical Feedback Alignment and Fluidic Control for Multiphase Flow-Assisted In Situ 3D Printing.Journal of separation science · 2026Article
- Microfluidic- and Field-Assisted 3D Printing: Leveraging Fluidic Control, Electrokinetic Phenomena, and Other Physical Fields to Advance Additive Manufacturing.Electrophoresis · 2025Review
- A gravity-driven tissue chip to study the efficacy and toxicity of cancer therapeutics.Lab on a chip · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In this work, we present a new 3D printing technique that enables the realization of native digital micro-mirror device (DMD) resolution in negative features of a 3D printed part without improving 3D printer hardware and demonstrate the fabrication of fully integrated, biocompatible isoporous membranes with pore sizes as small as 7 μm. We utilize this technique to construct a microfluidic device that mimics an established organ-on-a-chip configuration, including an integrated isoporous membrane. Two cell populations are seeded on either side of the membrane and imaged as a proof of concept for other organ-on-a-chip applications. These 3D printed isoporous membranes can be leveraged for a wide variety of other mechanical and biological applications, creating new possibilities for seamlessly integrated, 3D printed microfluidic devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.