Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38525685›Full record

ArticleAudiology research2024

Development of New Open-Set Speech Material for Use in Clinical Audiology with Speakers of British English.

Mahmoud Keshavarzi, Marina Salorio-Corbetto, Tobias Reichenbach, Josephine Marriage, Brian C J Moore

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Audiology research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 98% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mahmoud KeshavarziDepartment of Bioengineering and Centre for Neurotechnology, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK.
Marina Salorio-CorbettoCambridge Hearing Group, Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EB, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5621-5284
Tobias ReichenbachDepartment of Bioengineering and Centre for Neurotechnology, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK.
Josephine MarriageChear Ltd., Royston SG8 6QS, Herts, UK.
Brian C J MooreCambridge Hearing Group, Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EB, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7071-0671
University of Cambridge · GBFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEMelbourn Science Park · GB

Funding

Royal British Legion RBL 03
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Chear open-set performance test (COPT), which uses a carrier phrase followed by a monosyllabic test word, is intended for clinical assessment of speech recognition, evaluation of hearing-device performance, and the fine-tuning of hearing devices for speakers of British English. This paper assesses practice effects, test-retest reliability, and the variability across lists of the COPT.

methodIn experiment 1, 16 normal-hearing participants were tested using an initial version of the COPT, at three speech-to-noise ratios (SNRs). Experiment 2 used revised COPT lists, with items swapped between lists to reduce differences in difficulty across lists. In experiment 3, test-retest repeatability was assessed for stimuli presented in quiet, using 15 participants with sensorineural hearing loss.

resultsAfter administration of a single practice list, no practice effects were evident. The critical difference between scores for two lists was about 2 words (out of 15) or 5 phonemes (out of 50). The mean estimated SNR required for 74% words correct was -0.56 dB, with a standard deviation across lists of 0.16 dB. For the participants with hearing loss tested in quiet, the critical difference between scores for two lists was about 3 words (out of 15) or 6 phonemes (out of 50).

Indexed as

open-set speech materialphoneme analysisspeech testword analysis

Identifiers

PMID38525685
PMCPMC10961685
OpenAlexW4392162210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.