Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38525593›Full record

ArticleSubstance use & addiction journal2024

Perspectives of Canadian Healthcare and Harm Reduction Workers on Mobile Overdose Response Services: A Qualitative Study.

Navid Sedaghat, Boogyung Seo, Nathan Rider, William Rioux, S Monty Ghosh

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Substance use & addiction journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Navid SedaghatDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5363-8513
Boogyung SeoDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Nathan RiderCumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
William RiouxDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
S Monty GhoshDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
University of Alberta · CAUniversity of Calgary · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSupervised consumption sites (SCS) are an evidence-based intervention proven effective for preventing drug overdose deaths. Obstacles to accessing SCS include stigma, limited hours of operation, concerns about policing, and limited geographic availability. Mobile overdose response services (MORS) are novel technologies that provide virtual supervised consumption to help reduce the risk of fatal overdoses, especially for those who use alone. MORS can take various forms, such as phone-based hotlines and mobile apps. The aim of this article is to assess the perceptions of MORS among healthcare and harm reduction staff to determine if they would be comfortable educating clients about these services.

methodsTwenty-two healthcare and harm reduction staff were recruited from Canada using convenience, snowball, and purposive sampling techniques to complete semistructured interviews. Inductive thematic analysis informed by grounded theory was used to identify main themes and subthemes.

resultsFour themes were identified: (1) increasing MORS awareness among healthcare providers was seen as useful; (2) MORS might lessen the burden of drug overdoses on the healthcare system but could also increase ambulance callouts; (3) MORS would benefit from certain improvements such as providing harm reduction resources and other supports; and (4) MORS are viewed as supplements for harm reduction, but SCS were preferred.

conclusionsThis research provides valuable perspectives from healthcare and harm reduction workers to understand their perception of MORS and identifies key areas of potential improvement. Practical initiatives to improve MORS implementation outcomes exist.

Indexed as

Drug OverdoseHarm ReductionHealth PersonnelQualitative ResearchAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelCanadaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMobile Applicationsharm reduction providershealthcare providersmobile overdose responseopioid toxicityoverdoseservicessupervised consumption sites

Identifiers

PMID38525593
PMCPMC13021089
OpenAlexW4393159021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.