ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2024
Picosecond Nd:YAG versus Fractional CO
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of ablative fractional carbon dioxide laser combined with 1064 nm-Nd: YAG laser in the treatment of postburn hypertrophic scar.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
- Fractional picosecond laser treatment of non-acne atrophic scars and scar erythema in Chinese patients.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The picosecond laser was primarily designed to enhance tattoo removal. Because it has a new innovative mechanism for energy delivery, it has been modified to be used in other conditions such as skin resurfacing, which was usually treated with fractional CO Methods: The current prospective comparative randomized intrapatient study was done on 15 patients who presented with unsightly postburn scarring. As a split study, one-half of the affected areas were treated using the picosecond Nd: YAG laser. The other areas were treated with a fractional CO Results: The assessment by the image analysis system (Antera camera) showed improvement in all the parameters in both groups. The melanin relative variation decreased from 11.65 ± 2.86, 15.85 ± 5.63 to 10.60 ± 1.96, 12.56 ± 3.98, respectively in picosecond laser sites and fractional CO Conclusions: When compared with fractional CO
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.