ArticleQuantitative biology (Beijing, China)2019
WIPER: Weighted in-Path Edge Ranking for biomolecular association networks.
Article in Quantitative biology (Beijing, China), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- PAGER Web APP: An Interactive, Online Gene Set and Network Interpretation Tool for Functional Genomics.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Polar Gini Curve: A Technique to Discover Gene Expression Spatial Patterns from Single-cell RNA-seq Data.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: In network biology researchers generate biomolecular networks with candidate genes or proteins experimentally-derived from high-throughput data and known biomolecular associations. Current bioinformatics research focuses on characterizing candidate genes/proteins, or nodes, with network characteristics, Method: We developed Weighted In-Path Edge Ranking (WIPER), a new computational algorithm which can help evaluate all biomolecular interactions/associations ("edges") in a network model and generate a rank order of every edge based on their in-path traversal scores and statistical significance test result. To validate whether WIPER worked as we designed, we tested the algorithm on synthetic network models. Results: Our results showed WIPER can reliably discover both critical "well traversed in-path edges", which are statistically more traversed than normal edges, and "peripheral in-path edges", which are less traversed than normal edges. Compared with other simple measures such as betweenness centrality, WIPER provides better biological interpretations. In the case study of analyzing postanal pig hearts gene expression, WIPER highlighted new signaling pathways suggestive of cardiomyocyte regeneration and proliferation. In the case study of Alzheimer's disease genetic disorder association, WIPER reports SRC:APP, AR:APP, APP:FYN, and APP:NES edges (gene-gene associations) both statistically and biologically important from PubMed co-citation. Conclusion: We believe that WIPER will become an essential software tool to help biologists discover and validate essential signaling/regulatory events from high-throughput biology data in the context of biological networks. Availability: The free WIPER API is described at discovery.informatics.uab.edu/wiper/.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.