Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38525365›Full record

ArticleAEM education and training2024

Consensus-based ethical best practices for performing educational point-of-care ultrasonography in the emergency department.

Samantha K Chao, Yiju T Liu, Charles W Kropf, Robert D Huang, Nik Theyyunni, Lindsay A Taylor, Janice I Firn, Ross Kessler, Daniel R Micheller, Alethia J Battles and 7 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AEM education and training, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Samantha K ChaoDepartment of Emergency Medicine Michigan Medicine Ann Arbor Michigan USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9476-3003
Yiju T LiuDepartment of Emergency Medicine Harbor-UCLA Torrance California USA.
Charles W KropfDepartment of Emergency Medicine Michigan Medicine Ann Arbor Michigan USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8380-6664
Robert D HuangDepartment of Emergency Medicine Michigan Medicine Ann Arbor Michigan USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8928-473X
Nik TheyyunniDepartment of Emergency Medicine Michigan Medicine Ann Arbor Michigan USA.
Lindsay A TaylorDepartment of Emergency Medicine Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond Virginia USA.
Janice I FirnDepartment of Learning Health Sciences University of Michigan Medical School Ann Arbor Michigan USA.
Ross KesslerDepartment of Emergency Medicine University of Washington Seattle Washington USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9969-7693
Daniel R MichellerDepartment of Emergency Medicine Michigan Medicine Ann Arbor Michigan USA.
Alethia J BattlesMichigan Medicine Ann Arbor Michigan USA.
Natalja P RosculetDepartment of Emergency Medicine Michigan Medicine Ann Arbor Michigan USA.
Emily E AgerDepartment of Emergency Medicine Michigan Medicine Ann Arbor Michigan USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8263-1276
Alyssa A ValentyneDepartment of Emergency Medicine Michigan Medicine Ann Arbor Michigan USA.
Christine J SchellackUniversity of Michigan Medical School Ann Arbor Michigan USA.
John P HennessyUniversity of Michigan College of Pharmacy Ann Arbor Michigan USA.
Cameron WhiteUniversity of Michigan College of Pharmacy Ann Arbor Michigan USA.
Ryan V TuckerUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine Aurora Colorado USA.
University of Michigan · USMichigan Medicine · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · USUniversity of Washington · USVirginia Commonwealth University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: There is no standardized protocol for performing educational point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) that addresses patient-centered ethical issues such as obtaining informed consent. This study sought to define principles for ethical application of educational POCUS and develop consensus-based best practice guidance. Methods: A questionnaire was developed by a trained ethicist after literature review with the help of a medical librarian. A diverse panel including experts in medical education, law, and bioethics; medical trainees; and individuals with no medical background was convened. The panel voted on their level of agreement with ethical principles and degree of appropriateness of behaviors in three rounds of a modified Delphi process. A high level of agreement was defined as 80% or greater consensus. Results: Panelists voted on 38 total items: 15 related to the patient consent and selection process, eight related to practices while performing educational POCUS, and 15 scenarios involving POCUS application. A high level of agreement was achieved for 13 items related to patient consent and selection, eight items related to performance practices, and 10 scenarios of POCUS application. Conclusions: Based on expert consensus, ethical best practices include obtaining informed consent before performing educational POCUS, allowing patients to decline educational POCUS, informing patients the examination is not intended to be a part of their medical evaluation and is not billed, using appropriate draping techniques, maintaining a professional environment, and disclosing incidental findings in coordination with the primary team caring for the patient. These practices could be implemented at institutions to encourage ethical use of educational POCUS when training physicians, fellows, residents, and medical students.

Identifiers

PMID38525365
PMCPMC10955606
OpenAlexW4393044767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.