Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38525364›Full record

ArticleAEM education and training2024

"Cold feet": A qualitative study of medical students who seriously considered emergency medicine but chose another specialty.

Arvin R Akhavan, Amy V Kontrick, Haley Egan, Stephanie A Balint, Bryan G Kane, Joseph B House, Charles S Graffeo, D Mark Courtney, Dave W Lu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AEM education and training, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Five-Year Trends in Emergency Medicine Match Results and Future Outlook.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. An examination of the vacation behaviors of United States emergency physicians.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Arvin R AkhavanDepartment of Emergency Medicine University of Washington Seattle Washington USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0036-1004
Amy V KontrickDepartment of Emergency Medicine Northwestern University Chicago Illinois USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1823-0827
Haley EganDepartment of Emergency Medicine University of Washington Seattle Washington USA.
Stephanie A BalintQuinnipiac University Hamden Connecticut USA.
Bryan G KaneEmergency Medicine Lehigh Valley Hospital Bethlehem Pennsylvania USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9215-3837
Joseph B HouseDepartment of Emergency Medicine University of Michigan Ann Arbor Michigan USA.
Charles S GraffeoEmergency Medicine Eastern Virginia Medical School Norfolk Virginia USA.
D Mark CourtneyEmergency Medicine UT Southwestern Medical Center Dallas Texas USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0905-465X
Dave W LuDepartment of Emergency Medicine University of Washington Seattle Washington USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6874-2412

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Emergency medicine (EM) has historically been among the most competitive specialties in the United States. However, in 2022 and 2023, 219 of 2921 and 554 of 3010 respective National Resident Matching Program positions were initially unfilled. Medical students' selection of a medical specialty is a complex process. To better understand recent trends in the EM residency match, this qualitative study explored through one-on-one interviews the rationale of senior medical students who seriously considered EM but ultimately pursued another specialty. Methods: A convenience sample of senior medical students from across the United States was recruited via multiple mechanisms after the 2023 match. Participant characteristics were collected via an online survey. Qualitative data were generated through a series of one-on-one semistructured interviews and thematic analysis of the data was performed using a constant comparative approach. Results: Sixteen senior medical students from 12 different institutions participated in the study. Thematic saturation was reached after 12 interviews but data from all 16 interviews were included for qualitative analyses. Five major themes emerged as important in students' consideration but ultimate rejection of EM as a career: (1) innate features of EM attracted or dissuaded students, (2) widespread awareness of a recent workforce report, (3) burnout in EM, (4) their perception of EM's standing in the health care landscape, and (5) early EM experience and exposure. Conclusions: This qualitative study identified five major themes in the career decisions of senior medical students who seriously considered EM but chose another specialty. These findings may help inform the perceptions of students and guide future EM recruitment efforts.

Identifiers

PMID38525364
PMCPMC10955612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.