ArticleRegenerative biomaterials2024
One-step biofabrication of liquid core-GelMa shell microbeads for
Article in Regenerative biomaterials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Three-tier framework for high-throughput biofabrication: Integrating 3D bioprinting, assistive platforms, and translational opportunities.Bioactive materials · 2026Review
- One-Step Coaxial 3D Printing of Pre-Vascularized Skin Organoid Models with ADSC Microspheres for Enhanced Wound Healing.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- GelMA Core-Shell Microgel Preparation Based on a Droplet Microfluidic Device for Three-Dimensional Tumor Ball Culture and Its Drug Testing.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Rational design matrix materials for organoid development and application in biomedicine.Regenerative biomaterials · 2025Review
- Co-encapsulation of hepatocytes, mesenchymal stem cells and growth factor in arginine-glycine-aspartate functionalized microbeads for liver disease.Regenerative biomaterials · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There are many instances of hollow-structure morphogenesis in the development of tissues. Thus, the fabrication of hollow structures in a simple, high-throughput and homogeneous manner with proper natural biomaterial combination is valuable for developmental studies and tissue engineering, while it is a significant challenge in biofabrication field. We present a novel method for the fabrication of a hollow cell module using a coaxial co-flow capillary microfluidic device. Sacrificial gelatin laden with cells in the inner layer and GelMa in the outer layer are used via a coaxial co-flow capillary microfluidic device to produce homogenous micro-beads. The overall and core sizes of core-shell microbeads were well controlled. When using human vein vascular endothelial cells to demonstrate how cells line the inner surface of core-shell beads, as the core liquifies, a hollow cell ball with asymmetric features is fabricated. After release from the GelMa shell, individual cell balls are obtained and deformed cell balls can self-recover. This platform paves way for complex hollow tissue modeling
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.