Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38525302›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2024

Automated surgical step recognition in transurethral bladder tumor resection using artificial intelligence: transfer learning across surgical modalities.

Ekamjit S Deol, Matthew K Tollefson, Alenka Antolin, Maya Zohar, Omri Bar, Danielle Ben-Ayoun, Lance A Mynderse, Derek J Lomas, Ross A Avant, Adam R Miller and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Artificial intelligence in urology training Enhancing annotation, feedback, and evaluation in robotic, laparoscopic, and endoscopic surgery.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Ekamjit S DeolDepartment of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Matthew K TollefsonDepartment of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Alenka Antolintheator.io, Palo Alto, CA, United States.
Maya Zohartheator.io, Palo Alto, CA, United States.
Omri Bartheator.io, Palo Alto, CA, United States.
Danielle Ben-Ayountheator.io, Palo Alto, CA, United States.
Lance A MynderseDepartment of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Derek J LomasDepartment of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Ross A AvantDepartment of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Adam R MillerDepartment of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Daniel S ElliottDepartment of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Stephen A BoorjianDepartment of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Tamir Wolftheator.io, Palo Alto, CA, United States.
Dotan Asselmanntheator.io, Palo Alto, CA, United States.
Abhinav KhannaDepartment of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Automated surgical step recognition (SSR) using AI has been a catalyst in the "digitization" of surgery. However, progress has been limited to laparoscopy, with relatively few SSR tools in endoscopic surgery. This study aimed to create a SSR model for transurethral resection of bladder tumors (TURBT), leveraging a novel application of transfer learning to reduce video dataset requirements. Materials and methods: Retrospective surgical videos of TURBT were manually annotated with the following steps of surgery: primary endoscopic evaluation, resection of bladder tumor, and surface coagulation. Manually annotated videos were then utilized to train a novel AI computer vision algorithm to perform automated video annotation of TURBT surgical video, utilizing a transfer-learning technique to pre-train on laparoscopic procedures. Accuracy of AI SSR was determined by comparison to human annotations as the reference standard. Results: A total of 300 full-length TURBT videos (median 23.96 min; IQR 14.13-41.31 min) were manually annotated with sequential steps of surgery. One hundred and seventy-nine videos served as a training dataset for algorithm development, 44 for internal validation, and 77 as a separate test cohort for evaluating algorithm accuracy. Overall accuracy of AI video analysis was 89.6%. Model accuracy was highest for the primary endoscopic evaluation step (98.2%) and lowest for the surface coagulation step (82.7%). Conclusion: We developed a fully automated computer vision algorithm for high-accuracy annotation of TURBT surgical videos. This represents the first application of transfer-learning from laparoscopy-based computer vision models into surgical endoscopy, demonstrating the promise of this approach in adapting to new procedure types.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceautomated surgerycomputer-assisted surgerycomputer visionendourologysurgical intelligencesurgical step recognitionurology

Identifiers

PMID38525302
PMCPMC10958784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.