Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38525295›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2024

Lightweight preprocessing and template matching facilitate streamlined ischemic myocardial scar classification.

Michael H Udin, Sara Armstrong, Alice Kai, Scott Doyle, Ciprian N Ionita, Saraswati Pokharel, Umesh C Sharma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Michael H UdinUniversity at Buffalo, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Buffalo, New York, United States.
Sara ArmstrongUniversity at Buffalo, Jacobs School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Buffalo, New York, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-8747-6797
Alice KaiUniversity at Buffalo, Jacobs School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Buffalo, New York, United States.
Scott DoyleUniversity at Buffalo, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Buffalo, New York, United States.
Ciprian N IonitaUniversity at Buffalo, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Buffalo, New York, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7049-0592
Saraswati PokharelUniversity at Buffalo, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Buffalo, New York, United States.
Umesh C SharmaUniversity at Buffalo, Jacobs School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Buffalo, New York, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0476-2523

Funding

Inhibition of Radiation-Induced Coronary Microvascular DiseaseR01HL150266 · NHLBI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI POKHAREL, SARASWATI · 2021 to 2025
$2.1M
Immunomodulation of Galectin-3 to Prevent Radiation-Induced Myocardial FibrogenesisR01HL152090 · NHLBI · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI SHARMA, UMESH C · 2021 to 2025
$1.8M
Galectin-3-Mediated Post-Ischemic Myocardial Dysfunction and its Inhibition by a Novel Peptide N-Acetyl-Seryl-Aspartyl-Lysyl-ProlineK08HL131987 · NHLBI · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI SHARMA, UMESH C · 2017 to 2021
$987k
NHLBI NIH HHS K08 HL131987NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL150266NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL152090
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Ischemic myocardial scarring (IMS) is a common outcome of coronary artery disease that potentially leads to lethal arrythmias and heart failure. Late-gadolinium-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging scans have served as the diagnostic bedrock for IMS, with recent advancements in machine learning enabling enhanced scar classification. However, the trade-off for these improvements is intensive computational and time demands. As a solution, we propose a combination of lightweight preprocessing (LWP) and template matching (TM) to streamline IMS classification. Approach: CMR images from 279 patients (151 IMS, 128 control) were classified for IMS presence using two convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and TM, both with and without LWP. Evaluation metrics included accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), and processing time. External testing dataset analysis encompassed patient-level classifications (PLCs) and a CNN versus TM classification comparison (CVTCC). Results: LWP enhanced the speed of both CNNs (4.9x) and TM (21.9x). Furthermore, in the absence of LWP, TM outpaced CNNs by over 10x, while with LWP, TM was more than 100x faster. Additionally, TM performed similarly to the CNNs in accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, and AUROC, with PLCs demonstrating improvements across all five metrics. Moreover, the CVTCC revealed a substantial 90.9% agreement. Conclusions: Our results highlight the effectiveness of LWP and TM in streamlining IMS classification. Anticipated enhancements to LWP's region of interest (ROI) isolation and TM's ROI targeting are expected to boost accuracy, positioning them as a potential alternative to CNNs for IMS classification, supporting the need for further research.

Indexed as

cardiac magnetic resonance imagingischemic myocardial scarringmachine learningmedical image classificationneural networkstemplate matching

Identifiers

PMID38525295
PMCPMC10956816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.