Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38525294›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2024

AMS-U-Net: automatic mass segmentation in digital breast tomosynthesis via U-Net.

Ahmad Qasem, Genggeng Qin, Zhiguo Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ahmad QasemUniversity of Kansas Medical Center, The Reliable Intelligence and Medical Innovation Laboratory (RIMI Lab), Department of Biostatistics & Data Science, Kansas City, Kansas, United States.
Genggeng QinNanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Department of Radiology, Guangzhou, China.
Zhiguo ZhouUniversity of Kansas Medical Center, The Reliable Intelligence and Medical Innovation Laboratory (RIMI Lab), Department of Biostatistics & Data Science, Kansas City, Kansas, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8867-6907

Funding

Using Integrated Omics to Identify Dysfunctional Genetic Mechanisms Influencing Schizophrenia and Sleep DisturbancesP20GM130423 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI ANDREW K. GODWIN · 2019 to 2026
$21.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM130423
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The objective of this study was to develop a fully automatic mass segmentation method called AMS-U-Net for digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), a popular breast cancer screening imaging modality. The aim was to address the challenges posed by the increasing number of slices in DBT, which leads to higher mass contouring workload and decreased treatment efficiency. Approach: The study used 50 slices from different DBT volumes for evaluation. The AMS-U-Net approach consisted of four stages: image pre-processing, AMS-U-Net training, image segmentation, and post-processing. The model performance was evaluated by calculating the true positive ratio (TPR), false positive ratio (FPR), F-score, intersection over union (IoU), and 95% Hausdorff distance (pixels) as they are appropriate for datasets with class imbalance. Results: The model achieved 0.911, 0.003, 0.911, 0.900, 5.82 for TPR, FPR, F-score, IoU, and 95% Hausdorff distance, respectively. Conclusions: The AMS-U-Net model demonstrated impressive visual and quantitative results, achieving high accuracy in mass segmentation without the need for human interaction. This capability has the potential to significantly increase clinical efficiency and workflow in DBT for breast cancer screening.

Indexed as

automated segmentationbreast tumorsdigital breast tomosynthesismass segmentationmedical imagingu-net

Identifiers

PMID38525294
PMCPMC10960181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.