ArticlePeerJ2024
Retrospective evaluation of the morphometric properties of intact maxillary sinus using cone-beam computed tomography for sex estimation in an Indian population.
Article in PeerJ, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Big Nose Pattern at the Second Upper Molar-A Retrospective CBCT Study.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- CBCT assessment of maxillary sinus sexual dimorphism: morphometry and sex-classification performance in Peruvian adults.The Journal of forensic odonto-stomatology · 2026Observational
- CBCT based three dimensional odontometric mapping of maxillary anterior teeth in an Indian cohort to guide precision endodontic access cavity preparation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Sphenoid sinus hyperpneumatization: anatomical variants, molecular blueprints, and AI-augmented roadmaps for skull base surgery.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Review
- Three-Dimensional Measurements of Sphenoid Sinus Size by Sex in a Korean Population: An Exploratory Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sex estimation is crucial to forensic examinations. In order to estimate sex, intact bones are used if the majority of bones are severely deformed and recovered in fragments. This study aims to analyze sexual dimorphism in intact maxillary sinuses using CBCT scanning to evaluate morphometric properties for sex identification. Methods: A total of 318 subjects, consisting of 159 males and 159 females, aged between 20 and 60 years without sinus pathology were included in this diagnostic, retrospective cross-sectional study. Bilateral measurements of the volume, height, width, and length of the maxillary sinuses were obtained and compared to evaluate the differences between sexes. Subsequently, a descriptive analysis using mean and standard deviation was performed, followed by a comparison between sexes with a p-value being less than 0.05 and Student's t-test. Finally, a discriminant analysis was performed separately for the right and left maxillary sinuses. Results: Males and females showed statistically significant variations in the length, width, and volume of the maxillary sinuses. Specifically, on the right side, males had longer maxillary sinuses than females ( Conclusion: In forensic odontology, the volume of maxillary sinus can serve as a valid radiographic indicator of sex estimation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.