ArticleSaudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society2024
Current situation and barriers to women's leadership in health care education in Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional study.
Article in Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gender stereotypes about women in pharmacy leadership: evidence from a cross-sectional study in Lebanon.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- The inverted gender pyramid in career progression among GCC physicians: implications for health workforce policy.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The aims of the current study were to explore the true representation of female academic staff who have advanced to leadership positions in Saudi health academic institutions and to determine the possible barriers to women's advancement to leadership positions in academia. Methodology: This was a cross-sectional study conducted between August 2022 and August 2023 using an adapted self-reported online questionnaire via Google form. Data was analyzed descriptively and comparatively by presenting frequencies with percentages besides means with standard deviations across various background categories and comparing them using student Results: A total of 115 educators in health care professions participated in the study, three fifths of them were Saudi and female, with the majority being married and employed by government organizations. The most impactful structural challenges for female leadership included the centralization of decision-making within the institution, unclear organizational bylaws for leadership qualifications and appointment processes, and the existence of a wide range of administrative units. The prevailing belief that men possess superior capacity and management skills compared to women in leadership roles and the reluctance to accept women's authority by their subordinates were identified as the most influential culture challenges for female leadership. Most influential personality-related challenges included difficulty of balancing professional responsibilities with family obligations, stress and tension arising from reconciling the needs of subordinates with organizational goals and the complexity of traveling for work. Conclusions: The study identified the most influential structural, culture, and personality-related barriers and other potential perceived challenges faced by female leadership. A collective effort involving academic institutions, leadership, and relevant stakeholders is critical to address these barriers. Academic institutions must eliminate these challenges to utilize female leaders' talent fully, as they contribute unique perspectives and skills to their institutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.