Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38525235›Full record

ArticleJournal of veterinary research2024

Prevalence of

Anna Pańczuk, Małgorzata Tokarska-Rodak, Patrycja Andrzejuk

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of veterinary research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anna PańczukFaculty of Health Sciences Cambridge, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6628-0573
Małgorzata Tokarska-RodakFaculty of Health Sciences Cambridge, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2297-970X
Patrycja AndrzejukInnovation Research Centre, John Paul II University in Biała Podlaska, 21-500 Biała Podlaska, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-7393-2279

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Material and Methods: The study consisted in analyses of Results: Infections of Conclusion: The co-infection observed in the study suggests the possibility of simultaneous infection by both pathogens from a single tick bite. The presence of pathogens in ticks collected from dogs is a factor in assessing infection risk not only to companion animals but also to their owners, who are in close contact with their dogs and visit the same green areas recreationally.

Indexed as

anaplasmosiscanine borreliosiseastern Polandtick-borne infectionsticks

Identifiers

PMID38525235
PMCPMC10960333
OpenAlexW4392639007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.