Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38525234›Full record

ArticleJournal of veterinary research2024

Antibiotic resistance of

Olimpia Kursa, Grzegorz Tomczyk, Agata Sieczkowska, Anna Sawicka-Durkalec

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of veterinary research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Veterinary medicine international · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Multidrug Resistance ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Olimpia KursaDepartment of Poultry Diseases, National Veterinary Research Institute, 24-100 Puławy, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0058-1568
Grzegorz TomczykDepartment of Poultry Diseases, National Veterinary Research Institute, 24-100 Puławy, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6839-1082
Agata SieczkowskaDepartment of Poultry Diseases, National Veterinary Research Institute, 24-100 Puławy, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-2130-7494
Anna Sawicka-DurkalecDepartment of Poultry Diseases, National Veterinary Research Institute, 24-100 Puławy, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0162-2242

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Material and Methods: Results: The most prevalent antibiotic resistance was to tilmicosin, tylosin and quinupristin/dalfopristin (all 100%), erythromycin (96.2%), tetracycline (96.2%), linezolid (92.3%) and teicoplanin (92.3%). Universal susceptibility was to only one antibiotic, chloramphenicol. Statistically significant differences were found between the resistance of gastrointestinal tract strains and that of strains from other tracts to daptomycin, gentamicin, ciprofloxacin and colistin. The Conclusion: Most

Indexed as

antibiotic resistancechickensGallibacterium anatis

Identifiers

PMID38525234
PMCPMC10960332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.