Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38525164›Full record

ArticleBJR open2022

Expanding our concept of simulation in radiology: a "Radiology Requesting" session for undergraduate medical students.

James Hartley, Bobby Agrawal, Karamveer Narang, Edel Kelliher, Elizabeth Lunn, Roshni Bhudia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJR open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

James HartleyRoyal Papworth Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6041-3531
Bobby AgrawalRoyal Papworth Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Karamveer NarangRoyal Papworth Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Edel KelliherRoyal Papworth Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Elizabeth LunnUniversity of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Roshni BhudiaImperial College, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Whilst radiology is central to the modern practice of medicine, graduating doctors often feel unprepared for radiology in practice. Traditional radiological education focuses on image interpretation. Key areas which are undertaught include communication skills relating to the radiology department. We sought to design teaching to fill this important gap. Methods: We developed a small group session using Results: The session was delivered to 99 students over 24 sessions. Self-reported confidence in discussing imaging increased from an average of 1.7/5 to 3.4/5 as a result of the teaching ( Conclusions: The success of this innovative session suggests that it could form a key part of future undergraduate radiology education, and that the method could be applied in other areas to broaden the application of simulation. Advances in knowledge: This study highlights a gap in undergraduate medical education. It describes and demonstrates the effectiveness of an intervention to fill this gap.

Identifiers

PMID38525164
PMCPMC10958647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.