ArticlePhysical review research
Noise within: Signal-to-noise enhancement via coherent wave amplification in the mammalian cochlea.
Article in Physical review research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Latencies of Pulsed Distortion-Product Otoacoustic Emissions and Their Relation to Auditory Brainstem Responses.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The extraordinary sensitivity of the mammalian inner ear has captivated scientists for decades, largely due to the crucial role played by the outer hair cells (OHCs) and their unique electromotile properties. Typically arranged in three rows along the sensory epithelium, the OHCs work in concert via mechanisms collectively referred to as the "cochlear amplifier" to boost the cochlear response to faint sounds. While simplistic views attribute this enhancement solely to the OHC-based increase in cochlear gain, the inevitable presence of internal noise requires a more rigorous analysis. Achieving a genuine boost in sensitivity through amplification requires that signals be amplified more than internal noise, and this requirement presents the cochlea with an intriguing challenge. Here we analyze the effects of spatially distributed cochlear-like amplification on both signals and internal noise. By combining a straightforward mathematical analysis with a simplified model of cochlear mechanics designed to capture the essential physics, we generalize previous results about the impact of spatially coherent amplification on signal degradation in active gain media. We identify and describe the strategy employed by the cochlea to amplify signals more than internal noise and thereby enhance the sensitivity of hearing. For narrow-band signals, this effective, wave-based strategy consists of spatially amplifying the signal within a localized cochlear region, followed by rapid attenuation. Location-dependent wave amplification and attenuation meet the necessary conditions for amplifying near-characteristic frequency (CF) signals more than internal noise components of the same frequency. Our analysis reveals that the sharp wave cutoff past the CF location greatly reduces noise contamination. The distinctive asymmetric shape of the "cochlear filters" thus underlies a crucial but previously unrecognized mechanism of cochlear noise reduction.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.