Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38524919›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2024

Child immunization status according to number of siblings and birth order in 85 low- and middle-income countries: a cross-sectional study.

Francine S Costa, Larissa A N Silva, Bianca O Cata-Preta, Thiago M Santos, Leonardo Z Ferreira, Tewodaj Mengistu, Daniel R Hogan, Aluisio J D Barros, Cesar G Victora

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Francine S CostaInternational Center for Equity in Health, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
Larissa A N SilvaInternational Center for Equity in Health, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
Bianca O Cata-PretaInternational Center for Equity in Health, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
Thiago M SantosInternational Center for Equity in Health, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
Leonardo Z FerreiraInternational Center for Equity in Health, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
Tewodaj MengistuGavi, The Vaccine Alliance, Geneva, Switzerland.
Daniel R HoganGavi, The Vaccine Alliance, Geneva, Switzerland.
Aluisio J D BarrosInternational Center for Equity in Health, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
Cesar G VictoraInternational Center for Equity in Health, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Identification of unvaccinated children is important for preventing deaths due to infections. Number of siblings and birth order have been postulated as risk factors for zero-dose prevalence. Methods: We analysed nationally representative cross-sectional surveys from 85 low and middle-income countries (2010-2020) with information on immunisation status of children aged 12-35 months. Zero-dose prevalence was defined as the failure to receive any doses of DPT (diphtheria-pertussis-tetanus) vaccine. We examined associations with birth order and the number of siblings, adjusting for child's sex, maternal age and education, household wealth quintiles and place of residence. Poisson regression was used to calculate zero-dose prevalence ratios. Findings: We studied 375,548 children, of whom 13.7% (n = 51,450) were classified as zero-dose. Prevalence increased monotonically with birth order and with the number of siblings, with prevalence increasing from 11.0% for firstborn children to 17.1% for birth order 5 or higher, and from 10.5% for children with no siblings to 17.2% for those with four or more siblings. Adjustment for confounders attenuated but did not eliminate these associations. The number of siblings remained as a strong risk factor when adjusted for confounders and birth order, but the reverse was not observed. Among children with the same number of siblings, there was no clear pattern in zero-dose prevalence by birth order; for instance, among children with two siblings, the prevalence was 13.0%, 14.7%, and 13.3% for firstborn, second, and third-born, respectively. Similar results were observed for girls and boys. 9513 families had two children aged 12-35 months. When the younger sibling was unvaccinated, 61.9% of the older siblings were also unvaccinated. On the other hand, when the younger sibling was vaccinated, only 5.9% of the older siblings were unvaccinated. Interpretation: The number of siblings is a better predictor than birth order in identifying children to be targeted by immunization campaigns. Zero-dose children tend to be clustered within families. Funding: Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance.

Indexed as

Birth orderGlobal healthHealth surveysSiblingsVaccination

Identifiers

PMID38524919
PMCPMC10958219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.